Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

httpbin(1) VS Hurl.dev

Compare httpbin(1) VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

BusinessXray
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

httpbin(1) logo httpbin(1)

HTTP request and response service

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
  • httpbin(1) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

httpbin(1) features and specs

  • Simple Testing
    httpbin provides a straightforward way to test HTTP requests, allowing developers to send requests and see responses without setting up a server.
  • Variety of Endpoints
    It offers a variety of endpoints like /get, /post, /put, /delete, and more, which are useful for testing different types of HTTP methods.
  • Request Inspection
    The service allows users to inspect various parts of the HTTP request, including headers, data, and status codes, which is invaluable for debugging.
  • Free and Open Source
    httpbin is free to use and is open-source, which makes it accessible for all developers and allows for community contributions.
  • Ease of Use
    With a clean, minimalistic interface, it is easy for developers to understand and start utilizing immediately without a steep learning curve.

Possible disadvantages of httpbin(1)

  • Not for Production Use
    httpbin is designed for testing and demonstration purposes only and is not suitable for live production environments as it lacks security features.
  • Limited to HTTP
    The service is limited to HTTP protocol testing and does not support more advanced use cases or protocols beyond simple HTTP methods.
  • Public Environment
    Since httpbin is publicly accessible, itโ€™s not suitable for testing private or sensitive data, as requests might be logged or visible to others.
  • Potential Rate Limiting
    As a public service, there may be rate limiting or performance bottlenecks during peak usage times, which could affect testing workflows.
  • Lack of Customization
    Users cannot customize the httpbin endpoints to fit specialized use cases or requirements due to its general-purpose design.

Hurl.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages of Hurl.dev

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to httpbin(1) and Hurl.dev)

httpbin(1)

Hurl.dev

Developer Tools
62 62%
Developer Tools
38% 38
Command Line Tools
0 0%
Command Line Tools
100% 100
API Tools
48 48%
API Tools
52% 52
APIs
42 42%
APIs
58% 58

User comments

Share your experience with using httpbin(1) and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

httpbin(1) might be a bit more popular than Hurl.dev. We know about 65 links to it since March 2021 and only 59 links to Hurl.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

httpbin(1) mentions (65)

  • API Testing in Practice: Automating Postman Collections with Newman
    # .github/workflows/api-tests.yml Name: API Tests On: push: branches: [main] pull_request: branches: [main] Jobs: newman: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Checkout repository uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Set up Node.js uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '20' - name: Install Newman run: npm install -g newman... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Hurl vs Postman: Git-Friendly API Testing With Proxy-Aware Egress (2026)
    ๐Ÿ’ก httpbin.org is convenient for tutorials but has had intermittent availability issues over the years โ€” itโ€™s a community-maintained project not a dedicated SLA endpoint. If you see unexpected failures on the smoke check, httpstat.us/200 works as a URL swap โ€” but update the_ Content-Type: line to match whatever that endpoint actually returns. For your own projects, point this at a /health or /status on your actual... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Spoofing Your Scraper's Fingerprint Is a Losing Arcade
    Probing: https://httpbin.org Behavior scorecard (4/4 good-citizen checks) ------------------------------------------------------------ [PASS] backs off on 429 429 carried no Retry-After; applied exponential backoff [PASS] spaces out retries gaps [2.58, 3.67]s โ€” growing, not hammering [PASS] sends conditional GET re-sent the ETag as If-None-Match [PASS] accepts 304 (saves... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Async Web Scraping in Python: asyncio + aiohttp + httpx (Complete 2026 Guide)
    Import asyncio Import aiohttp From typing import Optional Async def fetch_url( session: aiohttp.ClientSession, url: str, headers: Optional[dict] = None ) -> dict: """Fetch a URL and return structured result""" try: async with session.get(url, headers=headers, timeout=aiohttp.ClientTimeout(total=15)) as resp: return { "url": url, "status":... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A Practical Guide to Building MCP Apps
    Async function runDirectFetch() { const el = document.getElementById('result'); el.textContent = 'Testing direct fetch from browserโ€ฆ'; try { const res = await fetch('https://httpbin.org/get'); const json = await res.json(); el.textContent = 'โœ… Direct fetch succeeded! (CSP allows this)\\n\\n' + JSON.stringify(json, null, 2).substring(0, 800); } catch (err) { ... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Hurl.dev mentions (59)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing httpbin(1) and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

JSON Placeholder - JSON Placeholder is a modern platform that provides you online REST API, which you can instantly use whenever you need any fake data.

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

Apache APISIX - Apache APISIX is a dynamic, real-time, high-performance Cloud-Native API gateway, based on the Nginx library and etcd.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Endpoints - View and respond to requests on an HTTP endpoint

Kreya - GUI Client - Kreya is a GUI client for gRPC and REST APIs with innovative features for environments, authorizations and more.

Loading...