Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CSS

Hover.css VS CSS Animate

Compare Hover.css VS CSS Animate and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Hover.css logo Hover.css

A collection of CSS3 powered hover effects to be applied to links, buttons, logos, etc.

CSS Animate logo CSS Animate

Well organized and easy to understand Web building tutorials with lots of examples of how to use HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SQL, PHP, Python, Bootstrap, Java and XML.
  • Hover.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-09
  • CSS Animate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Hover.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hover.css provides a wide variety of hover effects that are easy to implement by simply applying predefined CSS classes to HTML elements.
  • Wide Variety
    It offers over 41 different effects, providing developers with a broad selection to enhance user interfaces with minimal effort.
  • Customizable
    The effects can be customized to suit the needs of a project, allowing for modifications in timing, color, and behavior using additional CSS.
  • Lightweight
    Hover.css is lightweight, meaning it won't significantly increase the loading time of web pages, maintaining efficient performance.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across most modern browsers, ensuring consistent behavior for users regardless of their choice of browser.

Possible disadvantages of Hover.css

  • Limited Mobile Support
    Hover.css, like any hover-based effect library, is less effective on touch devices that do not support hover states.
  • Dependency on Modern CSS
    Some effects may use modern CSS techniques not supported by outdated browsers, potentially leading to inconsistent experiences.
  • Basic Customizability
    While customizable, the effects might require additional effort to deeply integrate unique interactions compared to writing custom CSS.
  • Overhead
    For simple projects, including an entire library for a few effects might be unnecessary overhead compared to creating bespoke effects with CSS.

CSS Animate features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hover.css and CSS Animate)

Hover.css

CSS Animate

Developer Tools
60 60%
Developer Tools
40% 40
Javascript UI Libraries
56 56%
Javascript UI Libraries
44% 44
Design Tools
68 68%
Design Tools
32% 32
Charting Libraries
0 0%
Charting Libraries
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hover.css and CSS Animate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hover.css and CSS Animate, you can also consider the following products

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Animista - Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser

vov.css - A small class-based animation library consisting of small but useful animations.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.

AniJS - A Library to Raise your Web Design without Coding.

Loading...