Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animista VS Hover.css

Compare Animista VS Hover.css and see what are their differences

Animista logo Animista

Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser

Hover.css logo Hover.css

A collection of CSS3 powered hover effects to be applied to links, buttons, logos, etc.
  • Animista Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-29
  • Hover.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-09

Animista features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Animista features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for users of all skill levels to create and customize CSS animations.
  • Variety of Animation Options
    The platform offers a wide range of pre-built animations, allowing users to explore and select from various styles and effects for their projects.
  • Real-Time Preview
    Users can see real-time previews of the animations as they customize them, which helps in making quick and informed adjustments.
  • Quick Export
    Animista provides an easy way to generate and export the CSS code for the animations, streamlining the development process.
  • Customization Controls
    The platform allows users to modify the duration, delay, and other properties of the animations, offering a high level of customization.

Possible disadvantages of Animista

  • Limited to CSS
    Animista focuses purely on CSS animations, which may not cover all animation needs, especially those requiring JavaScript or other more advanced techniques.
  • No Project Save Feature
    There is no inherent feature to save projects or settings within the tool, which means users have to reconfigure settings if they navigate away or close the browser.
  • Lack of Advanced Animation Features
    While the tool offers a variety of basic and intermediate animations, it may fall short for users needing highly complex or intricate animation sequences.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Animista is an online tool, so a stable internet connection is required to use it. This might be a limitation for users with unreliable internet access.
  • Potential Overhead
    Adding multiple animations generated from Animista might increase the CSS file size, potentially impacting website performance if not managed properly.

Hover.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hover.css provides a wide variety of hover effects that are easy to implement by simply applying predefined CSS classes to HTML elements.
  • Wide Variety
    It offers over 41 different effects, providing developers with a broad selection to enhance user interfaces with minimal effort.
  • Customizable
    The effects can be customized to suit the needs of a project, allowing for modifications in timing, color, and behavior using additional CSS.
  • Lightweight
    Hover.css is lightweight, meaning it won't significantly increase the loading time of web pages, maintaining efficient performance.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across most modern browsers, ensuring consistent behavior for users regardless of their choice of browser.

Possible disadvantages of Hover.css

  • Limited Mobile Support
    Hover.css, like any hover-based effect library, is less effective on touch devices that do not support hover states.
  • Dependency on Modern CSS
    Some effects may use modern CSS techniques not supported by outdated browsers, potentially leading to inconsistent experiences.
  • Basic Customizability
    While customizable, the effects might require additional effort to deeply integrate unique interactions compared to writing custom CSS.
  • Overhead
    For simple projects, including an entire library for a few effects might be unnecessary overhead compared to creating bespoke effects with CSS.

Animista videos

CSS Animations with Animista: Tool School 003

More videos:

  • Review - Creating easy CSS Animations in Muse with Animista

Hover.css videos

No Hover.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animista and Hover.css)
Design Tools
88 88%
12% 12
Developer Tools
83 83%
17% 17
Javascript UI Libraries
73 73%
27% 27
CSS Framework
82 82%
18% 18

User comments

Share your experience with using Animista and Hover.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animista seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animista mentions (22)

View more

Hover.css mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hover.css yet. Tracking of Hover.css recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animista and Hover.css, you can also consider the following products

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

vov.css - A small class-based animation library consisting of small but useful animations.

Keyframes.app - A timeline editor for CSS animations

Micron.JS - A [μ] microInteraction library built with CSS and JavaScript

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.