Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

HookReplay.dev VS Gotify

Compare HookReplay.dev VS Gotify and see what are their differences

HookReplay.dev

Debug webhooks on localhost in seconds. Receive, inspect, edit, and replay webhooks directly to your localhost using a CLI and WebSockets. No tunneling hacks. Free to start.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $29 / Monthly
Alternatives Is it good?
Gotify

a simple self-hosted server for sending and receiving messages

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
warmup.rocks
warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Gotify seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 39 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 39
Webhooks popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
24 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

HookReplay.dev
Gotify
Website hookreplay.dev gotify.net
Pricing
Freemium $29 / Monthly Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
Web MacOS Linux Windows +1
—
Listed in
Developer Tools API Tools Webhooks Localhost Tools +1
Push Notifications Web Push Notifications Open Source Mobile Push Messaging +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

HookReplay.dev 4 features
Gotify 7 features
  • Real-time Monitoring
    HookReplay.dev provides real-time monitoring of webhooks, allowing for the immediate detection of any issues or anomalies in the data flow.
  • Replay Feature
    The service allows users to replay webhooks, which is beneficial for debugging and ensuring the integrity of data delivery.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it accessible for users without extensive technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Logging
    Detailed logging capabilities help in tracking webhook activities and understanding their behavior over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on an external service for webhook management can introduce additional points of failure or latency in the data processing pipeline.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for users unfamiliar with webhook handling.
  • Cost
    Depending on the pricing model, using HookReplay.dev might introduce additional costs, which could be a concern for some businesses, especially small ones.
  • Limited Offline Capability
    As a web-based service, it may have limited functionality when offline, which could impede access to webhook data and monitoring if connectivity issues arise.
  • Open Source
    Gotify is open-source software, meaning its source code is publicly available. This allows users to inspect, modify, and distribute the software freely.
  • Self-Hosting Capable
    Users can self-host Gotify on their own servers, giving them full control over their data and message delivery.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    Gotify provides real-time notifications, ensuring that messages are delivered promptly.
  • Web UI and API
    Includes a web-based user interface for ease of management and a comprehensive API for integration with other systems.
  • Customizable
    Gotify supports message customization, including priority levels and message formatting, enabling users to tailor notifications to their needs.
  • Lightweight
    Gotify is designed to be lightweight, with minimal resource usage, making it suitable for a wide range of hosting environments.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Gotify offers clients for multiple platforms, including mobile apps for both iOS and Android.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires Server Knowledge
    Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted instance of Gotify requires a certain level of technical knowledge and server management skills.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Self-hosting Gotify means that users are responsible for keeping the software up-to-date and secure, potentially requiring ongoing attention.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established notification systems, Gotify has a smaller ecosystem in terms of plugins, integrations, and community support.
  • Message Delivery
    Since Gotify relies on self-hosting, the reliability of message delivery is dependent on the stability and performance of the user's server infrastructure.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Running Gotify on a small server might not scale well for high volumes of notifications, potentially requiring more complex infrastructure for larger use cases.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

HookReplay.dev
Gotify

Overall verdict

  • HookReplay.dev appears to be a solid, purpose-built tool for developers who need reliable webhook inspection, debugging, and replay capabilities, offering a focused feature set that streamlines otherwise painful webhook troubleshooting workflows.

Why this product is good

  • Lets you capture, inspect, and replay webhook payloads without redeploying or manually re-triggering events
  • Speeds up debugging by giving clear visibility into headers, payloads, and delivery status
  • Reduces development friction when integrating with third-party services that send webhooks
  • Helps test webhook handling locally or in staging environments safely
  • Saves time by letting you re-send failed or malformed events instead of reproducing them from scratch

Recommended for

  • Backend developers integrating third-party APIs that rely on webhooks
  • Teams building payment, notification, or event-driven systems (e.g. Stripe, GitHub, Shopify webhooks)
  • QA engineers testing webhook-dependent flows in staging
  • Startups and small teams needing lightweight webhook debugging without heavy infrastructure
  • Developers troubleshooting intermittent or failed webhook deliveries

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Gotify is considered a solid choice for individuals or organizations looking for a simple, self-hosted push notification system without the complexities and costs of third-party services. Its focus on privacy, control, and ease of use make it especially attractive to tech-savvy users or those with specific requirements for data hosting.

Why this product is good

  • Gotify is often praised for its simplicity and open-source nature, making it appealing for users who need straightforward server-side push notification solutions. It supports self-hosting, which allows for greater control over data privacy and server customization. Additionally, Gotify is known for its ease of integration, thanks to its REST API, and the flexibility it offers in terms of notification management and customization.

Recommended for

  • Developers and tech enthusiasts seeking a self-hosted push notification solution.
  • Organizations that prioritize data privacy and need greater control over their notification infrastructure.
  • Users looking for an uncomplicated and easily customizable push notification service.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
HookReplay.dev
Gotify
100% 100%
Webhooks
0% 0%
0% 0%
Push Notifications
100% 100%
100% 100%
API Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Web Push Notifications
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing HookReplay.dev and Gotify.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

HookReplay.dev's answer

Still early — just launched. Currently used by indie developers and small teams debugging Stripe and Shopify integrations. No big logos yet. Focused on building a great product first.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

HookReplay.dev's answer

With ngrok, every code change means triggering another webhook. Add a log? Trigger again. Set a breakpoint? Too late, it timed out. Trigger again. With HookReplay, you trigger once. Then replay 100 times while you debug. Same webhook. Same payload. Unlimited attempts to get your code right. That's not a small difference — it's hours saved per debugging session.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

HookReplay.dev's answer

Developers who integrate third-party webhooks Stripe, Shopify, GitHub, Twilio, Paddle, etc. Basically anyone who's ever clicked "Send test webhook" more times than they'd like to admit.

What's the story behind your product?

HookReplay.dev's answer

11pm on a Sunday. A customer's Stripe payment went through, but their subscription wasn't created. I needed to debug the webhook handler. Set up ngrok. Triggered a test payment. Added a log statement. Triggered again. Set a breakpoint — webhook timed out before I could step through. Triggered again. Changed the URL in Stripe because ngrok restarted. Triggered again. Three hours later, I found a typo in my event type check. I remember thinking: I just re-triggered the same webhook 40+ times. Why can't I just capture it once and replay it until I find the bug? That's the moment HookReplay was born. The tool I wished existed that night.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

HookReplay.dev's answer

ASP.NET Core for the backend, PostgreSQL for storage, WebSockets for real-time forwarding to the CLI. The CLI is built in .NET and distributed via npm — runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Nothing fancy. Boring tech that works.

What makes your product unique?

HookReplay.dev's answer

Three things most webhook tools don't do: 1- Replay the same webhook unlimited times 2- Edit payloads before replaying (test edge cases) 3- Keep a full history of every webhook received HookReplay does all three, plus real-time forwarding like ngrok.

User comments

Share your experience with using HookReplay.dev and Gotify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

HookReplay.dev no reviews yet
Gotify no reviews yet

We have no reviews of HookReplay.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

HookReplay.dev 0 mentions
Gotify 39 mentions

Tracking HookReplay.dev since Jan 2026.

  • Ntfy – open-source Push to Mobile
    I've been using Gotify [1] for a very long time and have been quite happy with it. Basically no impact on battery life. For devs - there are mature libraries like shoutrr [2] and apprise [3] that let you support multiple notification... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Ntfy.sh – Send push notifications to your phone via PUT/POST
    I do use gotify [1] which seems to be pretty much the same, and does the job quite well. Not sure how they compare, does ntfy goes through Google / Apple network or it's directly connected to your server instance? [1] https://gotify.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Pushover
    Gotify is a self-hosted notification server with a clean web UI for managing applications and messages. Each application gets its own token, and messages arrive via WebSocket — no polling, no push service dependency. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

View more

Alternatives to HookReplay.dev and Gotify

When comparing HookReplay.dev and Gotify, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...