
hookVM
Webhook.site
ngrok
Hooklistener
Webhooks.cc
Hookmetry
RequestBin
Debug webhooks on localhost in seconds. Receive, inspect, edit, and replay webhooks directly to your localhost using a CLI and WebSockets. No tunneling hacks. Free to start.

Agentmemory
Mem0
Stop re-explaining your project to Claude every session. ContextForge adds persistent memory to Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot via MCP. Free tier, 3-minute setup.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ContextForge.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | jackaroo.hookreplay.dev | contextforge.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of HookReplay.dev yet.
ContextForge is persistent, searchable memory for AI coding agents — built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Your AI assistant forgets everything when the session ends. ContextForge fixes that: save architectural decisions, naming conventions, and debugging context once, and any MCP client...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No HookReplay.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How to Make Claude Run Automated Workflows (ContextForge Skills Tutorial)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing HookReplay.dev and ContextForge.dev.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Still early — just launched. Currently used by indie developers and small teams debugging Stripe and Shopify integrations. No big logos yet. Focused on building a great product first.
HookReplay.dev's answer
With ngrok, every code change means triggering another webhook. Add a log? Trigger again. Set a breakpoint? Too late, it timed out. Trigger again. With HookReplay, you trigger once. Then replay 100 times while you debug. Same webhook. Same payload. Unlimited attempts to get your code right. That's not a small difference — it's hours saved per debugging session.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Most memory tools are tied to a single agent or are just a key-value store. ContextForge is MCP-native, so it's portable across all your AI tools; it adds git sync so your codebase history becomes searchable context automatically; and it includes team features (shared spaces, collaborators) that solo-memory tools lack. Setup is one command, there's a genuine free-forever tier with no credit card, and paid plans start at just $9/month.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Developers who integrate third-party webhooks Stripe, Shopify, GitHub, Twilio, Paddle, etc. Basically anyone who's ever clicked "Send test webhook" more times than they'd like to admit.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Software developers and engineering teams who use AI coding assistants — Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, Windsurf — and are tired of re-explaining their project, architecture, and conventions every session. It fits solo developers working across multiple projects as well as small teams that need shared, persistent context.
HookReplay.dev's answer
11pm on a Sunday. A customer's Stripe payment went through, but their subscription wasn't created. I needed to debug the webhook handler. Set up ngrok. Triggered a test payment. Added a log statement. Triggered again. Set a breakpoint — webhook timed out before I could step through. Triggered again. Changed the URL in Stripe because ngrok restarted. Triggered again. Three hours later, I found a typo in my event type check. I remember thinking: I just re-triggered the same webhook 40+ times. Why can't I just capture it once and replay it until I find the bug? That's the moment HookReplay was born. The tool I wished existed that night.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
ContextForge was born from a simple frustration: AI coding agents forget everything the moment a session ends. Every new conversation meant re-explaining the same architecture, naming conventions, and past decisions. ContextForge was built to give AI agents a permanent, searchable memory through the Model Context Protocol — so knowledge is captured once and reused forever, across sessions and projects. It even dogfoods its own memory to help build itself.
HookReplay.dev's answer
ASP.NET Core for the backend, PostgreSQL for storage, WebSockets for real-time forwarding to the CLI. The CLI is built in .NET and distributed via npm — runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Nothing fancy. Boring tech that works.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
Next.js 16 (App Router), React and Tailwind CSS for the dashboard, hosted on Vercel. Supabase (PostgreSQL) with pgvector powers the semantic vector search, and Deno edge functions serve the API. Embeddings use OpenAI text-embedding-3-small. The MCP client is a Node.js package (contextforge-mcp) on npm, implementing the Model Context Protocol.
HookReplay.dev's answer
Three things most webhook tools don't do: 1- Replay the same webhook unlimited times 2- Edit payloads before replaying (test edge cases) 3- Keep a full history of every webhook received HookReplay does all three, plus real-time forwarding like ngrok.
ContextForge.dev's answer:
ContextForge is memory that lives at the MCP layer, so it works across every AI coding agent at once — Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Windsurf — not just one. Save a decision once and any client recalls it later with semantic search. It goes beyond a note store: automatic git sync turns your commits and PRs into searchable knowledge, plus task tracking, snapshots, and team sharing — all through a single MCP server you add with one command.
Share your experience with using HookReplay.dev and ContextForge.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking HookReplay.dev since Jan 2026.
Init links the folder to a project, so every agent working in that repo reads and writes the same memory, and it adds the rules that make sessions check who else is live before big changes. For Cursor, Copilot, Claude Desktop and... - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
I built ContextForge because I was losing this argument with my own agents several times a week. The idea is small: when we decide something, the agent saves the decision with the reason, in the project's memory. The next session, in... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
When comparing HookReplay.dev and ContextForge.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Receive, deliver, and debug webhooks with reliability, observability, and developer-first tooling.
Compare hookVM to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev:

Persistent memory for Claude Code, Codex & coding agents
Compare Agentmemory to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev:

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
Compare Webhook.site to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev:

Your private, local memory layer for all AI tools
Compare Mem0 to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev:

The developer-friendly webhook inspector with real-time team collaboration, request replay, and permanent history.
Compare Hooklistener to HookReplay.dev or ContextForge.dev: