Harvest VS git-fastclone

• User Friendly Interface
  Harvest offers an intuitive and clean interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize various features without extensive training.
• Comprehensive Time Tracking
  It provides detailed time tracking capabilities, allowing users to log hours spent on various tasks and projects, which helps in accurate billing and productivity analysis.
• Seamless Integrations
  Harvest integrates with numerous third-party applications such as Asana, Trello, Slack, and QuickBooks, enhancing its functionality and fitting into existing workflows effortlessly.
• Invoicing and Payments
  The platform supports invoicing and payments, enabling users to generate invoices directly from tracked hours and receive payments through different payment gateways.
• Detailed Reporting
  Harvest offers robust reporting features that provide insights into time usage, project progress, and team performance, aiding in decision-making and resource allocation.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Harvest's pricing can be relatively high for small businesses or freelancers, especially when additional features or seats are needed.
• Limited Mobile Functionality
  While Harvest does have mobile apps, they are not as fully featured as the desktop version, which can limit usability for those who need to manage tasks on the go.
• Manual Time Entry
  The process of manually entering time can be cumbersome for some users, especially in scenarios where automatic time tracking would be more efficient.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  Although the basic functionality is easy to use, there can be a learning curve when it comes to mastering more advanced features and reporting tools.
• Limited Customization
  Harvest offers limited options for customization in terms of the user interface and report formats, which can be a drawback for users who need tailored solutions.

• Faster clone times
  git-fastclone speeds up cloning of repositories with submodules by using reference repositories and caching, avoiding redundant downloads of shared objects across multiple clones.
• Efficient submodule handling
  It automates the recursive cloning and updating of git submodules, reducing the manual overhead typically involved in managing nested repositories.
• Local object caching
  By maintaining a local cache of repository objects, it minimizes network usage and disk space when cloning multiple repositories that share common history or dependencies.
• Simple drop-in usage
  It is designed to be used similarly to the standard git clone command, making it easy for teams to adopt without significant changes to their existing workflows.
• Useful for CI/CD pipelines
  Its speed improvements are particularly beneficial in continuous integration environments where repositories with many submodules are cloned repeatedly, reducing build times.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maintenance
  The project has seen infrequent updates and community activity in recent years, which may raise concerns about long-term support and compatibility with newer git versions.
• Narrow use case
  It is primarily beneficial for repositories with many submodules; for simple repositories without submodules, the performance gains are minimal or negligible.
• Additional complexity
  Introducing a caching and reference mechanism adds complexity to the clone process, which could lead to unexpected issues if the cache becomes corrupted or outdated.
• Dependency on Ruby environment
  Since git-fastclone is implemented as a Ruby gem, users need a working Ruby environment installed, which can be an extra setup requirement for teams not already using Ruby.
• Potential caching pitfalls
  Improper cache invalidation or stale cached objects can potentially lead to inconsistencies in cloned repositories if not carefully managed.

I TRIED DAILY HARVEST FOR A WEEK // HONEST DAILY HARVEST REVIEW

More videos

No git-fastclone videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Time tracker alternatives
  teetrack.it · Jul 2026

  Looking for a different time tracker? These guides compare Teetrack head-to-head with popular tools like Toggl, Clockify, and Harvest — covering pricing, billing features, data export, and how migration works. Each...

• What Are the Best Bill.com Alternatives?
  blog.featured.com · Mar 2025

  Invoicing used to take me a couple of days and was one of my most dreaded activities. However, since we started using Harvest (getharvest.com) for our time-tracking and invoicing, it takes less than an hour. Harvest...

• 10 Best RescueTime Alternatives for Time Tracking in 2024
  clickup.com · May 2024

  Harvest is an easy-to-use time-tracking platform to create invoices, generate reports, monitor budgets, and track costs. The app integrates seamlessly with accounting and project management tools like Asana, Trello,...

View more

We have no reviews of git-fastclone yet. Be the first one to post

• software for planning upcoming months work

  If that’s not enough, I’ve had good experience with http://getharvest.com (and accompanying tools from them). Source: over 3 years ago

• Software Developer Mac Apps

  Https://getharvest.com/ : time tracker for contract work. Source: over 3 years ago

• What do you guys for invoicing outside Upwork?

  I use getharvest.com to track hourly and convert them to invoice. The only thing I don't like is that I have to add the task in the web dashboard rather than entering directly in the desktop app. There is 'note' field, but it won't show... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking git-fastclone since Mar 2021.