Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

HackerRank VS Fast Elections

Compare HackerRank VS Fast Elections and see what are their differences

HackerRank

HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Fast Elections

Run a secret-ballot election in minutes. Voters get a one-time link by email — no accounts, no per-member fees. Free for elections up to 25 voters.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $19 / One-off (Up to 300 voters)
Alternatives Is it good?
Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, HackerRank seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 67 times since March 2021.

social mentions
67 vs 0
Hiring And Recruitment popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 19

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

HackerRank
Fast Elections
Website hackerrank.com fastelections.com
Pricing —
Freemium $19 / One-off (Up to 300 voters) Official pricing
Platforms —
SaaS
Company — Startup from the United States · 2026
Listed in
Hiring And Recruitment Online Learning Online Education Skill Assessment +1
Election Management Voting Online Voting SaaS HOA / Association Management Club Management +3

About HackerRank and Fast Elections

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

HackerRank
Fast Elections

No description of HackerRank yet.

Fast Elections is a web-based, accesible (WCAG 2.1), secret-ballot online voting service for small organizations — clubs, schools, PTAs, HOAs, unions, and small nonprofits — that need a defensible election without government-grade pricing. Organizers can create an election, invite voters, and...

Read more about Fast Elections

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

HackerRank 7 features
Fast Elections 12 features
  • Skill Assessment
    HackerRank provides a structured way to assess coding skills through a wide range of programming challenges and problems.
  • Wide Range of Languages
    Supports numerous programming languages, making it versatile for users with different preferences and expertise.
  • Interview Preparation
    Offers various interview preparation kits and company-specific challenges to help candidates prepare for job interviews.
  • Community and Collaboration
    A community of coders where users can discuss problems, share solutions, and collaborate on coding projects.
  • Company Recruitments
    Many companies use HackerRank for recruitment, and performing well on the platform can lead to job opportunities.
  • Leaderboard and Gamification
    Features like leaderboards and gamification elements motivate users to improve their rankings and skills continuously.
  • Educational Resources
    Provides tutorials and explanations that help users understand algorithms and data structures better.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find some problems too challenging, which can be discouraging if they lack foundational knowledge.
  • Potential Focus on Competitive Programming
    The platform may emphasize competitive programming skills, which are not always directly applicable to all real-world software development scenarios.
  • Quality Variance in Problems
    The quality and difficulty of problems can vary, which may affect the consistency of the learning experience.
  • Limited Real-World Project Experience
    The focus on algorithms and coding challenges means there's less emphasis on full-scale project development experience.
  • Limited Feedback
    Automated grading provides limited feedback, which may not be enough for users to understand their mistakes fully.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to some premium content and features requires a subscription, which may not be affordable for all users.
  • Network Dependency
    Requires a good internet connection to participate in coding challenges and access resources, which may be a limitation for some users.
  • True Secret Ballot
    Protect voter privacy by design with Fast Elections' true secret ballot — cast ballots are stored with no reference back to the voter, timestamps are rounded to the hour, and the roster records only that someone voted, never what they chose.
  • Cast Ballot Confirmation
    Let every voter confirm their ballot was counted — Fast Elections issues a short receipt code at the moment of voting and publishes the full list of codes with the results, so a voter can verify their own ballot without revealing how they voted.
  • Numerous Ballot Options
    Match your bylaws instead of rewriting them — run plurality, pick-N, approval, ranked choice, or yes/no/abstain motions, with write-in candidates and weighted voting by shares, units, or delegation size on every method.
  • Result Transparence
    See exactly how a ranked-choice race was won — Fast Elections shows every instant-runoff round, including who was eliminated and where their votes transferred, so you can put the full count in the minutes.
  • Increase Voter Participation
    Get ballots into inboxes without chasing anyone — send invitations with each voter's unique one-time link, trigger automatic reminders that skip people who already voted, and fix a single bounced address and resend just that ballot instead of starting over.
  • Quick Import of Voter List
    Build your roster in minutes — paste a voter list or import a CSV or XLSX file with problem rows flagged line by line and duplicate emails removed automatically, then tag voters into groups so a question only appears for the chapter, district, or role that should see it.
  • Voter Registration
    Let voters sign themselves up — share a public registration link or a printable QR poster with Fast Elections' self-serve registration, and approve registrants automatically on sign-up or hold each one for an administrator's decision.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Reach every member in their own language — ballots, invitations, reminders, and results emails are available in 10 languages including Spanish, Vietnamese, Simplified Chinese, and Tagalog, translated by hand at no cost or by AI for a $5 add-on.
  • Live Turnout & Publishable Result
    Watch turnout live and publish results the moment polls close — Fast Elections shows how many have voted while the election runs (never partial counts), then delivers per-question results with an optional public link, one-click emailed results to voters, and CSV export for the audit trail.
  • Start & Stop on Your Schedule
    Open and close the polls on schedule — launch immediately or schedule the opening, set an automatic close so nobody has to end the vote at midnight, and extend a running election's end time with automatic reminders rescheduling themselves to match.
  • Flat Price Per Election
    Pay one flat price per election, never per member — Fast Elections is free for elections up to 25 voters and $19 to $99 for larger rosters, with every feature included at every tier and no annual subscription.
  • Multiple Admins Supported
    Run it as an organization, not a one-person project — invite up to 10 administrators, put your logo and accent color on ballots, results, registration pages, and voter emails, and add candidate photos and bios to the ballot, while voters never need to create an account at all.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

HackerRank
Fast Elections

Overall verdict

  • Yes, HackerRank is generally considered a good platform for improving coding skills and preparing for technical interviews. It is widely used by developers to hone their coding abilities and by companies to assess candidates' coding proficiency.

Why this product is good

  • HackerRank is a popular platform for coding enthusiasts, offering a wide range of programming challenges and competitions. It stands out for its extensive problem library, which is beneficial for practice and learning. The platform supports multiple programming languages and provides detailed feedback on submissions, making it a valuable tool for both beginners and experienced programmers.

Recommended for

    HackerRank is recommended for students, individual learners, and job seekers looking to improve their coding skills, as well as for companies seeking an efficient way to evaluate candidates' technical abilities during the hiring process.

No analysis of Fast Elections yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

HackerRank 3 videos + Add
Fast Elections 0 videos + Add

Is HackerRank A Good Idea?

More videos

  • - LeetCode vs HackerRank
  • - Difference between HackerRank, LeetCode, topcoder and Codeforces

No Fast Elections videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
HackerRank
Fast Elections
100% 100%
Hiring And Recruitment
0% 0%
0% 0%
Online Voting
100% 100%
100% 100%
Online Learning
0% 0%
0% 0%
Election Management
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing HackerRank and Fast Elections.

What makes your product unique?

Fast Elections's answer:

Fast Elections is real election software built for the volunteer who runs one vote a year.

The secret ballot is architectural, not a promise. A cast ballot is stored as a standalone record with no reference back to the voter and only an hour-rounded timestamp, so it can't be tied to a person or narrowed down by when it arrived. Voting links are single-use and only their hash is ever stored, so even a read of the database can't reconstruct a working link. We can't connect a ballot to a voter either — and we publish how it works instead of just asserting it.

Voters can check the count themselves. Every voter gets a receipt code and can find that code in the published results.

Pricing is one flat charge per election, sized to the roster, with every feature included at every tier — free up to 25 voters, then $19, $49, or $99. No per-member seats, no annual contract, nothing to cancel.

Voters never create an account. They get a one-time link by email, vote, and get a receipt. Organizers can also share a link or a printable QR poster and let voters register themselves.

The ballot methods are the serious ones: plurality and pick-N, ranked choice (instant-runoff, with every elimination round shown), approval voting, and yes/no/abstain motions — plus write-ins, weighted votes for share- or unit-based memberships, and per-question eligibility for segmented ballots. Ballots and voter emails run in 10 languages.

And it's one founder, not a call center. The person who wrote the counting code answers the support mail, within one business day.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Fast Elections's answer:

Price and scope. Most election platforms are built for governments or large enterprises and priced accordingly — per-member seats, annual contracts, quotes, or a sales call. Fast Elections charges once per election based on roster size: free up to 25 voters, $19 up to 300, $49 up to 1,000, $99 up to 5,000. That's a number a volunteer treasurer can approve without a board vote, and it doesn't recur when your club isn't voting.

No feature gating. Ranked choice, approval voting, weighted votes, write-ins, custom branding, multi-language ballots, self-serve voter registration, up to 10 administrators — all included at every tier, including the free one. Competitors routinely put ranked choice or branding behind a higher plan.

Setup in minutes, not a project. Paste or import your roster from CSV or Excel, write your questions, and launch. Voters need no account and nothing to install.

Trust you can show your members. Receipt codes let each voter verify their own ballot is in the published count, and instant-runoff results display every elimination round rather than just a winner — so you can answer "how did that come out?" at the meeting.

Support from the builder. Not a ticket queue: the founder who designed and wrote the software reads the mail and answers within one business day.

Worth saying plainly: this is not built for government or enterprise-scale elections. If you need a certified public-sector election system, buy one. If you're a club, PTA, HOA, union local, or small nonprofit running an honest internal vote, this is built for exactly you.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Small, volunteer-run organizations that hold one to a few elections a year and have no IT department: garden and social clubs, PTAs, student governments and school clubs, homeowners' and condo associations, union locals, professional associations, churches, and small nonprofits.

The person who signs up is usually a secretary, treasurer, board chair, or election committee volunteer — someone who has been running the vote on paper or in a survey tool, is losing an evening to counting, and needs a secret ballot the membership will actually trust. Typical rosters run from a couple dozen to a few thousand voters; the platform tops out at 5,000 per election.

Fast Elections is deliberately not built for government or enterprise-scale elections.

What's the story behind your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Serious election software is usually built for governments — and priced for them. But the groups that actually run the most elections are garden clubs, PTAs, student governments, HOAs, union locals, and small nonprofits. They end up choosing between a survey tool that can't keep a ballot secret and a paper count that eats an evening. Either way, somebody at the meeting eventually asks whether the result can be trusted.

Fast Elections was built by Votivigy LLC to be the honest middle: a real secret ballot, a receipt each voter can verify for themselves, ranked choice that shows its rounds, and a price a volunteer treasurer can approve without a procurement process. Charging once per election, sized to the roster, follows from the same idea — that's when the work happens, so that's when you pay. No seats, no annual contract, no renewal you forget to cancel.

Votivigy LLC is Jason Cline. He designed Fast Elections, wrote the software that runs it, and reads the mail that comes to jason@fastelections.com. When you ask why a tally came out the way it did, the answer comes from the person who built the counting.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Frontend: TypeScript, Vue 3, Vuetify 4, Vite, Vue Router, and vue-i18n, with marketing pages prerendered via vite-ssg.

Backend: fully serverless on AWS.

Payments: Stripe Checkout with signature-verified webhooks.

The serverless choice is deliberate — it costs almost nothing while idle, which is what makes a $19 election economically possible.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Fast Elections's answer:

Fast Elections serves small, volunteer-run member organizations — clubs, PTAs, HOAs, student governments, union locals, and small nonprofits — running internal votes. We don't publish customer names without permission, and as a young product we don't yet have public reference customers to list.

User comments

Share your experience with using HackerRank and Fast Elections. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

HackerRank no reviews yet
Fast Elections no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Fast Elections yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

HackerRank 67 mentions
Fast Elections 0 mentions
  • How to Stop Getting Lost in Endless Resources and Stay Focused as a Developer
    This way, you transfer what you already know (problem-solving) but only change the syntax. Platforms like Hackerrank are also great to solve the same problem in different languages and learn from other people’s solutions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Pick up new languages faster this way!
    Firstly, solve some common data structure problems with it. Implement some data structures like arrays, linked lists, stacks, queues, etc. You can check common problems on LeetCode, Hackerank or some other resources. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Offline alternative of hackerrank.com to practice coding offline
    I don't have a consecutive internet connection and I can't keep up learning process so I started practicing in hackerrank.com I have started some challenges in python and c++ there. Thus I have no internet connection so I cannot practice... Source: almost 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Fast Elections since Aug 2026.

Alternatives to HackerRank and Fast Elections

When comparing HackerRank and Fast Elections, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...