Greasemonkey VS HTTPS Always

• Customization
  Greasemonkey allows users to customize the appearance and functionality of a website by injecting JavaScript code, offering a high degree of personalization.
• User Community
  A large community of users and developers contributes to a vast library of scripts, enabling users to easily find and install scripts that meet their needs.
• Open Source
  As an open-source project, Greasemonkey encourages transparency and collaboration, allowing developers to contribute and improve the functionality of the extension.
• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  Greasemonkey scripts are compatible with most modern browsers through various extensions, allowing scripts to work across different systems.

Possible disadvantages

• Security Risks
  Scripts can potentially contain malicious code, leading to security vulnerabilities if users install scripts from untrusted sources.
• Script Maintenance
  Users may need to maintain or update scripts themselves, especially when websites update their layout or functionality, causing existing scripts to break.
• Limited Browser Support
  While Greasemonkey is primarily designed for Firefox, users of other browsers might need to use alternative extensions like Tampermonkey, which may not support all features of Greasemonkey.
• Learning Curve
  Users who wish to create or modify scripts need a good understanding of JavaScript, which may pose a challenge to those less familiar with coding.

• Security
  HTTPS encrypts data between the user's browser and the server, protecting sensitive information from interception and ensuring privacy and data integrity.
• Improved SEO
  Search engines like Google prioritize sites that use HTTPS, potentially improving page ranking and visibility in search results.
• User Trust
  Websites with HTTPS are perceived as more trustworthy by users, who can see a secure padlock icon in the address bar, leading to increased user confidence and engagement.
• Data Integrity
  HTTPS ensures that data sent and received is not altered in transit, providing a reliable and accurate exchange of information.
• Compliance
  Many privacy regulations and standards require the use of HTTPS to protect user data, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Implementing HTTPS can involve costs related to obtaining SSL/TLS certificates, especially for larger organizations with numerous subdomains.
• Performance Overhead
  HTTPS requires additional processing power for encryption and decryption, potentially leading to slightly reduced performance or increased server load.
• Complexity
  Setting up HTTPS can be more complex than a non-secure HTTP connection, requiring technical expertise and resources for proper implementation and management.
• Certificate Expiration
  SSL/TLS certificates have expiration dates and must be renewed regularly, which can add maintenance tasks and risks if not managed properly.
• Mixed Content Issues
  When a secure site loads insecure resources (e.g., images or scripts), it can lead to 'mixed content' warnings, potentially compromising the site's security and user trust.

• Auto-redirect from English to Simple English if such an article exist in Simple English

  // ==UserScript== // @name Wikipedia Redirect // @namespace https://greasespot.net // @version 0.1 // @description Redirect from English Wikipedia to Simple English Wikipedia if the page exists // @author Noname //... Source: over 3 years ago

Tracking HTTPS Always since Jun 2021.