Grammarly Reviews

1. Highdalink

   · Founder at HighDALink · 11 months ago
   Best content editing app

   Grammarly is top especially with content editing and Google doc integration features.

   🏁 Competitors: Writesonic, Ryte, Jasper.ai

   👍 Pros:    High quality content|Google doc integration

   👎 Cons:    Expensive
2. Michael Hasty

   · Writer at DRS · over 3 years ago

   Grammarly is a fantastic tool that helps users step up their writing game by providing real-time grammar, spelling, and punctuation corrections. It is designed to help you create polished, professional content and ensure your message is clear and concise. Whether you're a student, professional, or just someone who wants to improve their writing skills, Grammarly has got your back.

   🏁 Competitors: ProWritingAid

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Thorough grammar check|Style and tone suggestions|Plagiarism detector

   👎 Cons:    Limited free version|Occasionally misses errors
3. Eleanor Bennett

   · Digital Marketing Specialist at Logit.io · about 4 years ago
   Love the Google Docs plugin

   Grammarly is the most useful to me for its Google Docs feature that supports me as I create new content. Unfortunately, they seem to provide more context and insights when I am sending an email rather than writing an entire document.

Temporal Reviews

Grammarly mentions (85)

• The Best 100 Free UI/UX Resources for Every Designer & Developer

  Grammarly Grammarly.com Free writing assistant to enhance clarity and grammar in UI text. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Are these changes really necessary?

  Use Grammarly, the app or the extension. Source: about 3 years ago

• 🧰 AI Tools +150 Tools in 6 Categories

  Grammarly - An online writing tool that helps users improve their writing skills and beat writer’s block. I use it everyday…. Source: about 3 years ago

• What drives the registration price of domain extensions?

  I asked the question. Response text generated by ChatGPT and corrected by Grammarly.com. Source: about 3 years ago

• Prestige-Blinded Questbridge Asian With Barebones Application Learns to Dispel His Myopia (but somehow lucks out)

  I did not have anyone read over my essays. I regret that now, knowing that my application would have cried out for joy if only there were a reader other than grammarly.com and my drowsy midnight self. I also wrote my essay a day before the Questbridge deadline (I think the deadline was Sept 27th?), which is a terrible, TERRIBLE idea. Please do not do things last minute :D. Source: about 3 years ago

Temporal mentions (17)

• Temporal in Production: Sharp Edges & Good Practices

  When a team moves from a monolith into microservices and event-driven, asynchronous systems, it inherits a class of problems that used to be someone else's: work that fails halfway through, steps that must not run twice, calls that return before the work is done. Temporal is a durable execution engine that handles a lot of this - you define a multi-step process, and it guarantees the process runs to completion... - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago

• Your Agent Bills While It Waits. Here's the Fix.

  Durable execution — the pattern implemented by Temporal, Inngest, Rivet Actors, and now Cloudflare Workflows — treats waiting as a continuation rather than a loop:. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago

• Compiler as Custodian

  Two specific moves stand out in Duncan's account. The first is durable execution, via Temporal — Mercury replaced fragile cron-and-database state machines with workflow code whose failure semantics are platform-handled (replay, retry, timeout, cancellation). Mercury open-sourced its hs-temporal-sdk, which wraps Temporal's official Rust Core SDK via FFI and provides a Haskell-native API. The dovetail with Haskell's... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• How we turned our workflow editor into a real SDK

  We picked Temporal as the first reference engine on purpose. Temporal has the strictest execution model we know of – a V8 sandbox, determinism constraints, replay-driven recovery. If our port contract holds up against that, easier engines – an in-memory test double, a BullMQ queue, or JSON-first platforms like Inngest or Restate – plug in through the same two interfaces. We're shipping Temporal first; the rest is... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Three days debugging a missing trace

  The trick is to find whatever metadata channel the queue already gives you and use that and thankfully, almost every mature queue has one (probably because of this scenario). SQS has message attributes, Temporal has context propagators built into the SDK, and Hatchet (which we use to run our workflows) has a metadata field called additionalMetadata. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago