Software Alternatives & Startups

gping (CLI) VS Zenmap

Compare gping (CLI) VS Zenmap and see what are their differences

gping (CLI)

Ping, but with a graph. Contribute to orf/gping development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
Zenmap

Zenmap is the official cross-platform GUI for the Nmap Security Scanner.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Zenmap seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 12
Monitoring Tools popularity
13% vs 87%
alternatives listed
31 vs 156

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

gping (CLI)
Zenmap
Website github.com nmap.org
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

gping (CLI) 5 features
Zenmap 5 features
  • Visual real-time graphing
    gping provides a real-time, terminal-based graph of ping latency over time, making it easy to visually spot trends, spikes, and packet loss at a glance — something the standard ping command cannot do.
  • Multi-host comparison
    You can ping multiple hosts simultaneously and see their latency graphs side by side in the same terminal window, which is extremely useful for comparing network paths or diagnosing routing issues.
  • Cross-platform support
    gping is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and can be installed via popular package managers like Homebrew, Chocolatey, Scoop, and various Linux package managers, making it accessible on virtually any platform.
  • Simple and intuitive CLI
    The tool is very easy to use with minimal configuration required. Just run 'gping <host>' and you immediately get a useful visual output. The command-line flags are straightforward and well-documented.
  • Supports arbitrary command graphing
    Beyond just pinging hosts, gping can graph the execution time of arbitrary commands using the --cmd flag, making it a versatile tool for monitoring the performance of any repeatable command over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires installation of additional binary
    Unlike the standard ping command which is pre-installed on virtually every operating system, gping must be separately downloaded and installed, which may not be feasible in locked-down or minimal server environments.
  • Limited data export and logging
    gping is primarily a visual tool and lacks robust options for exporting ping data to files or structured formats (like CSV or JSON) for later analysis, making it less suitable for long-term monitoring or automated reporting.
  • Terminal size dependency
    The quality and usefulness of the graph depends heavily on terminal window size. In small terminal windows, the graph can become compressed and hard to read, losing much of the visual advantage over standard ping.
  • No alerting or threshold features
    gping does not support configuring alerts or notifications when latency exceeds a certain threshold or packet loss occurs, limiting its usefulness as a proactive monitoring tool compared to dedicated network monitoring solutions.
  • Resource overhead compared to standard ping
    As a graphical TUI application, gping consumes more CPU and memory than the standard ping utility. While generally negligible on modern systems, this can matter on resource-constrained embedded devices or when running many instances.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Zenmap provides a graphical interface that makes it easier for users to conduct network scans without needing to memorize command-line options.
  • Visualization Tools
    It includes tools for visualizing scan results, such as network topology diagrams, which can help in understanding network structure and vulnerabilities.
  • Profile Management
    Supports saving scan configurations as profiles, enabling quick re-runs of common scans with predefined settings.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Zenmap is available for multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it versatile for different environments.
  • Integration with Nmap
    Leverages the powerful capabilities of Nmap, a well-known network scanning tool, providing advanced scanning options and performance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Overhead
    The graphical interface can add additional performance overhead compared to the command-line version of Nmap, which may be noticeable during large scans.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its graphical interface, Zenmap still requires a certain level of understanding about network scanning concepts and Nmap parameters to effectively use it.
  • Limited Customization
    While it supports many Nmap features, some advanced customization options available in the command-line version may be less accessible or harder to implement in Zenmap.
  • Security Risks
    Running a graphical network scanning tool can attract unwanted attention on shared or monitored systems as it might appear in process lists or leave trace logs, potentially indicating a security tool is being used.
  • Complexity in Large Data Sets
    When dealing with very large data sets or complex networks, the visual output can become cluttered or difficult to interpret efficiently.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

gping (CLI)
Zenmap

Overall verdict

  • gping is an excellent, lightweight open-source CLI tool that modernizes the classic ping command by adding a real-time graphical visualization of latency directly in your terminal, making it a favorite among developers and sysadmins.

Why this product is good

  • Displays ping latency as a live, scrolling graph right in the terminal for easy visual analysis
  • Supports pinging multiple hosts simultaneously and comparing their latency side by side
  • Cross-platform support for Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Written in Rust, making it fast, efficient, and reliable
  • Free and open-source with an active community and simple installation via common package managers
  • Can execute commands and graph their execution time, not just network pings

Recommended for

  • Network engineers and system administrators troubleshooting connectivity or latency issues
  • Developers who want a quick visual sense of network performance
  • Users who need to compare latency across multiple hosts at once
  • Anyone comfortable working in the command line who wants a more informative alternative to traditional ping

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Zenmap is a good tool.

Why this product is good

  • Zenmap is the official graphical user interface (GUI) for the Nmap Security Scanner, which is highly regarded for its ability to discover hosts and services on a computer network. Zenmap simplifies Nmap's complex functionality, making it more accessible to users who may not be as comfortable with command-line operations. It provides features such as network inventory, managing service upgrade schedules, and monitoring host or service uptime. Additionally, Zenmap is open-source and supports multiple operating systems, making it flexible and widely available.

Recommended for

  • Network administrators who need to map out or monitor their networks.
  • Security professionals performing security audits or vulnerability assessments.
  • IT personnel responsible for managing enterprise networks.
  • Enthusiasts interested in learning more about network security and scanning techniques.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

gping (CLI) 0 videos + Add
Zenmap 2 videos + Add

No gping (CLI) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Scan for Open Ports w/ Zenmap - Review

More videos

  • - Zenmap Tutorial - Network Scanning Tool

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
gping (CLI)
Zenmap
13% 13%
87% 87%
9% 9%
91% 91%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using gping (CLI) and Zenmap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

gping (CLI) no reviews yet
Zenmap no reviews yet

We have no reviews of gping (CLI) yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

gping (CLI) 0 mentions
Zenmap 12 mentions

Tracking gping (CLI) since Mar 2026.

  • Would you like to be a movie star by contributing to open source?
    It is a command line tool that also has an official GUI called Zenmap. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Upgrading my opnsense setup. Today I am trying to give names to all my devices checking what is connected to my network, need help.
    Another way would be to use nmap from a Linux machine or virtual machine using: $ sudo nmap 192.168.0.1/24 where the subnet address is replaced with yours. They have a graphic interface, that I haven't used, but you might want to test... Source: over 3 years ago
  • What is this eye icon on the taskbar? Never seen it before.
    I agree with this but the eye is not exactly the same. https://nmap.org/zenmap/. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to gping (CLI) and Zenmap

When comparing gping (CLI) and Zenmap, you can also consider the following products.