Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
SCI-HUB
Forge
Leap Motion
360ยฐ media
CardBoard
arXiv
Pl@ntNet
PictureThis
iNaturalist
Garden Answers
Botan: Plant Identifier
Gardenia
HortusFox
Plant Parent
Google Scholar Pl@ntNetBased on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Pl@ntNet. While we know about 1005 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Pl@ntNet. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To learn about sentiment analysis, I'd look for related datasets and then look at recent code, e.g. here: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets?search=sentiment+analysis For more LLM-specific stuff, you can pick some agent trace dataset on https://huggingface.co/datasets?format=format%3Aagent-traces and check out what people are doing with it (usually linked on the right when you click on a dataset). And of course... - Source: Hacker News / 22 days ago
Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
> Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
There are a number of phone apps that will identify trees from a picture. I personally prefer plantnet.org (non-profit entity / no ads or tracking). Source: about 4 years ago
You can also go directly to plantnet.org and perform the same check. Source: over 4 years ago
Get the app from plantnet.org. It's developed by a non-profit consortium of European organizations. I promise it's completely ad free and won't terrorize you in any way. Source: over 4 years ago
You could scrape them off the plantnet.org site. But unless your problem is purely academic you could skip creating your own engine and just use their API. Source: almost 5 years ago
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
PictureThis - Instantly identify your plants
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
iNaturalist - iNaturalist is known as one of the most popular nature applications that helps you to identify the animals, plants, insects, and lots of other things with just a single click.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple
Garden Answers - Garden Answers is an online plant identification application that allows you to get detailed information about any plants or flowers in your garden.