Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Scholar VS Extractor API

Compare Google Scholar VS Extractor API and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Google Scholar logo Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

Extractor API logo Extractor API

Extract clean text from thousands of articles with a simple API request or use our visual web tool - we'll handle IP rotation, retries and everything else. Features include news search, translation, and ML-powered text extraction.
  • Google Scholar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07
  • Extractor API Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11

Features

IP Rotation & JS Rendering

We automatically apply IP rotation and retries to every request (Free Plan included), and all our paid plans allow you to render JavaScript before extraction.

Search Country News

Free and paid plans can search the world's news with our News Search endpoint. Every request returns up to 100 news items, including metadata. Collect the URLs - then extract clean text with our Extractor endpoint.

Clean Text & Metadata

Extract clean text, HTML, image and video links, authors, title, publication date, html, and raw text. Choose only the fields you need.

API Not Required

You can extract data from up to 1,000 URLs at a time using our online visual extractor - not just the API. The visual extractor is included in all plans.

Store Your Results

Both the API and the visual extractor allow you to store your results in Jobs. Assign your target URLs a job name, then see their progress online or programmatically. Once the job is done, you can retrieve the results any time.

Translate Extracted Text

All paid accounts are able to translate to and from 55 languages. Swahili to English, Vietnamese to French, or anything you want - extract clean text and translate it with a single API call.

Google Scholar

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Startup details
Country
United States

Extractor API

$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Windows Browser Web Android iOS Mac OSX Google Chrome Linux Firefox Cross Platform REST API Safari JavaScript iPhone Chrome OS Internet Explorer Windows Phone Python Node JS Ruby Java C PHP .Net Go Swift C++ Docker ReactJS TypeScript
Release Date
2020 March

Google Scholar features and specs

  • Accessibility
    Google Scholar is freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, removing barriers to accessing academic research.
  • Wide Range of Sources
    It indexes scholarly articles from a broad range of disciplines and sources, including academic publishers, universities, and other scholarly websites.
  • Citation Tracking
    Google Scholar provides citation information, allowing users to see how often a paper has been cited and to track the influence of research over time.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is user-friendly and familiar to anyone who has used Google, making it easy to search for and find scholarly papers.
  • Advanced Search Options
    Google Scholar offers advanced search capabilities, including the ability to search by author, date range, and specific journals.

Possible disadvantages of Google Scholar

  • Quality Control
    The inclusion criteria for sources indexed are not transparent, leading to variability in the quality of the materials available.
  • Coverage
    Although extensive, Google Scholar's coverage is not comprehensive, and some important journals and articles might be missing.
  • Duplicate Entries
    There can be multiple entries for the same document, making it difficult to determine the most authoritative version.
  • Limited Full-Text Availability
    Many articles listed in Google Scholar are behind paywalls, meaning full access often requires a subscription or purchase.
  • Inconsistent Metadata
    The metadata (author names, publication dates, etc.) can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, affecting search results and citation tracking.

Extractor API features and specs

  • Robust API
    We handle IP rotation, retries and JavaScript rendering - you get clean text.
  • News Search
    Search the world's news with a single API call - up to 100 results per request.
  • Extract Everything
    Extract clean text, translate it into 50+ languages and get tons of metadata.
  • Visual Extraction
    Don't want to use the API? Use our visual online tool to paste or upload URLs!
  • Persistent Jobs
    Both our API and online tool allow you to save extracted text to your Jobs page.
  • Quick Start
    Check out the Getting Started guide for a quick overview of the API and the FAQ for more info.

Analysis of Google Scholar

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Google Scholar is considered a good resource for academic research. It is user-friendly, provides comprehensive search results, and includes useful features such as citation analysis and linking to full-text articles when available. However, it may not have access to all subscription-only content available through university libraries or specialized databases.

Why this product is good

  • Google Scholar is a valuable tool because it provides free access to a vast range of scholarly articles, theses, books, conference papers, and patents across various disciplines. It indexes content from academic publishers, research institutions, and other scholarly websites, making it a convenient resource for researchers, students, and academics. Its citation tracking feature is particularly useful for understanding the impact and relevance of specific works.

Recommended for

  • Students looking for scholarly articles for their assignments.
  • Researchers who want to track citations and research trends.
  • Academics needing access to a wide range of publications.
  • Anyone interested in finding reliable, peer-reviewed sources for information.

Google Scholar videos

How to do a literature review using Google Scholar

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use Google Scholar | Writing A Literature Review
  • Tutorial - How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips

Extractor API videos

Extractor API - Visual Extractor Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Scholar and Extractor API)
Digital Whiteboard
100 100%
0% 0
Data Extraction
0 0%
100% 100
Research Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Scraping API
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Scholar and Extractor API. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Scholar and Extractor API

Google Scholar Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Scholar yet.
Be the first one to post

Extractor API Reviews

Creating an Automated Text Extraction Workflow โ€” Part 1
The 600 lbs gorilla, Diffbot, comes with a swath of solid APIs but starts at $300, which is ridiculous if youโ€™re just extracting text. Scrapinghubโ€™s News API, Extractor API, and plenty more are better priced if you want an affordable alternative; plus, Extractor API includes a visual online tool for extracting hundreds of articles at once, if you want to do things via UI.
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Extractor API. While we know about 1005 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Extractor API. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Scholar mentions (1005)

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash on a Single AMD MI300X
    To learn about sentiment analysis, I'd look for related datasets and then look at recent code, e.g. here: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets?search=sentiment+analysis For more LLM-specific stuff, you can pick some agent trace dataset on https://huggingface.co/datasets?format=format%3Aagent-traces and check out what people are doing with it (usually linked on the right when you click on a dataset). And of course... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
  • Who discovered grokking and why is the name hard to find?
    Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • AI generated font using nano banana
    Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • ChatGPT Search
    > Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Is Psychology Going to Cincinnati?
    He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Extractor API mentions (3)

  • webscraping for sentiment analysis
    Take a look at our webscraping API - should be able to do what you need it to do. https://extractorapi.com/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Using ChatGPT to build a database from web scraping?
    If you want to make it easier, we built a text extraction tool that can fit a number of use cases https://extractorapi.com/ people are using it instead of GPT for the scraping and then in certain cases feeding the data that comes from here to some broader app/use case. Just another route! Source: about 3 years ago
  • Text Extraction Tool for Training your ChatGPT app
    I'm looking for input on our tool as a pipeline for text data into your own ChatGPT use case. We know you can use ChatGPT API to do the same task, but we've found that to be costly and time-consuming for the text extraction/scraping portion. We've built a cost-effective and quick tool, Extractor API, for that use case. Would love to see what others are using outside of just relying on ChatGPT for text extraction. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Scholar and Extractor API, you can also consider the following products

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Microlink - Extract structured data from any website

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Schema API - Extract structured content from the semantic web

Forge - Static web hosting made simple

CRX Extractor - Get any Chrome Extension source code. Learn and hack!