Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
SCI-HUB
Forge
Leap Motion
360ยฐ media
CardBoard
arXiv
CodeClimate
Codacy
SonarQube
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
CodeFactor.io
Source-Navigator NG
Google Scholar CodeClimateBased on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than CodeClimate. While we know about 1004 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 19 mentions of CodeClimate. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
> Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Automated analysis tools: SonarQube, CodeClimate, and Codacy detect code-level debt automatically: cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, dependency staleness, and coverage gaps. These tools supplement but don't replace the architectural and business-logic debt that requires human judgment to identify and document. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
CodeClimate and Codacy can generate before/after metrics for code quality that make the starting and ending states concrete rather than subjective. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
CodeClimate quantifies maintainability so teams canโt hand-wave garbage away. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Code Climate: Link - Automated code review and quality analysis for codebase health. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Use tools like SonarQube or CodeClimate to spot the high-risk 20%. Then fix one thing at a time not everything at once. This isnโt Dark Souls. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple
ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool