Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Persistent Disk VS Microsoft Azure Storage

Compare Google Persistent Disk VS Microsoft Azure Storage and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google Persistent Disk logo Google Persistent Disk

Google Persistent Disk is a high performance block storage for the Google Cloud Platform.

Microsoft Azure Storage logo Microsoft Azure Storage

Azure Storage is a durable, scalable cloud storage solution.
  • Google Persistent Disk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27
  • Microsoft Azure Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-29

Google Persistent Disk features and specs

  • High Durability
    Google Persistent Disk offers reliable storage with redundancy across multiple disks, ensuring data durability and reducing the risk of data loss.
  • Automatic Backups
    Supports automated snapshots for easy backup and recovery, allowing you to restore data to any point in time.
  • Scalability
    Easily scalable to accommodate growing storage needs. You can increase your storage capacity without downtime.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services for efficient management and utilization within the cloud ecosystem.
  • Performance
    Provides persistent, high-performance block storage suitable for a wide range of applications, including databases and high-traffic websites.

Possible disadvantages of Google Persistent Disk

  • Cost
    Pricing can become expensive, especially with large data sets or high IOPS requirements, compared to some other storage options.
  • Zonal Availability
    Dependent on the geographical location of the data center and may require particular configurations for applications needing multi-region failover support.
  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring persistent disks might be complex for users unfamiliar with Google Cloud's interface and services.
  • Performance Limits
    Though performance is generally high, it may have limitations, such as maximum IOPS and throughput, depending on the disk type and size.

Microsoft Azure Storage features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Google Persistent Disk videos

No Google Persistent Disk videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Microsoft Azure Storage videos

+ Add

Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer Desktop Client Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Persistent Disk and Microsoft Azure Storage)

Google Persistent Disk

Microsoft Azure Storage

Cloud Storage
41 41%
Cloud Storage
59% 59
Object Storage
36 36%
Object Storage
64% 64
Cloud Computing
43 43%
Cloud Computing
57% 57
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Persistent Disk and Microsoft Azure Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Persistent Disk seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Persistent Disk mentions (2)

  • SSDs Have Become Fast, Except in the Cloud
    This is untrue of Local SSD (https://cloud.google.com/local-ssd) in Google Cloud. Local SSDs are PCIe peripherals. There are also multiple Persistent Disk (https://cloud.google.com/persistent-disk) offerings that are backed by SSDs over the network. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • All your notes are stored in an open, unsecure, and unencryped format on the Remarkable cloud. Just so you know.
    Google uses several layers of encryption to protect customer data at rest. All customer content stored at rest is encrypted, without any action required from the customer, using one or more encryption mechanisms. All data stored in Google Cloud is encrypted at the storage level using AES256, with the exception of a small number of Persistent Disks created before 2015 that use AES128. Source: over 4 years ago

Microsoft Azure Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft Azure Storage yet. Tracking of Microsoft Azure Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Persistent Disk and Microsoft Azure Storage, you can also consider the following products

Pure Storage - Pure Storage is an all-flash enterprise storage solution that accelerate random I/O-intensive applications like server virtualization, deskt

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

AWS Storage Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway is a service connecting an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage.

Nimble Storage - Nimble Storage provides storage infrastructure combined with predictive analytics.

Coho Data - Coho Data provides software-defined networking integrated storage appliances for private clouds.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Loading...