Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon S3 VS Google Persistent Disk

Compare Amazon S3 VS Google Persistent Disk and see what are their differences

Amazon S3 logo Amazon S3

Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Google Persistent Disk logo Google Persistent Disk

Google Persistent Disk is a high performance block storage for the Google Cloud Platform.
  • Amazon S3 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-01

Amazon S3 (Amazon Simple Storage Service) is the storage platform by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides an object storage with high availability, low latency and high durability. S3 can store any type of object and can serve as storage for internet applications, backups, disaster recovery, data archives, big data sets and multimedia.

  • Google Persistent Disk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27

Amazon S3 features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon S3 automatically scales storage resources to meet user demands, enabling businesses to store a virtually unlimited amount of data without worrying about capacity constraints.
  • Durability
    Amazon S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 9's) durability, ensuring that your data is highly protected against loss and corruption.
  • Security
    Amazon S3 offers robust security features, including encryption at rest and in transit, fine-grained access controls, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).
  • Integrations
    Amazon S3 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as EC2, Lambda, and RDS, as well as third-party applications, facilitating a cohesive cloud environment.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    Amazon S3 offers a range of storage classes, allowing users to optimize costs based on their access patterns, from frequently accessed data to long-term archival storage.
  • Global Availability
    Amazon S3 is available in multiple regions worldwide, providing low latency and high availability for users around the globe.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon S3

  • Complexity
    The wide array of features and configurations in Amazon S3 can be overwhelming for beginners, requiring a steep learning curve and careful planning.
  • Cost Predictability
    Although cost-effective, the pricing model of Amazon S3 can be complex due to various factors such as storage volume, data transfer rates, and request frequency, leading to unpredictable costs if not monitored closely.
  • Performance Variation
    While generally offering high performance, the speed of data retrieval from Amazon S3 can vary based on factors like object size, storage class, and region, potentially affecting time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Migration Tools
    Although Amazon provides data migration services, some users find the migration tools and processes cumbersome, especially when moving large volumes of data from other storage solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Amazon S3 and other AWS services can make it difficult to switch providers or develop a multi-cloud strategy, leading to potential vendor lock-in concerns.

Google Persistent Disk features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Amazon S3 videos

Introduction to Amazon S3

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with Amazon S3 - AWS Online Tech Talks
  • Review - Amazon S3 Review: Amazon S3
  • Review - Amazon S3 Glacier Cloud Storage: What You Need to Know
  • Review - Wasabi vs. Amazon S3

Google Persistent Disk videos

No Google Persistent Disk videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon S3 and Google Persistent Disk)
Cloud Hosting
99 99%
1% 1
Cloud Storage
94 94%
6% 6
Cloud Computing
97 97%
3% 3
Object Storage
95 95%
5% 5

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon S3 and Google Persistent Disk. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Amazon S3 and Google Persistent Disk

Amazon S3 Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Amazon S3 is suitable for applications of any size requiring reliable and scalable storage.
Source: signoz.io
Best Top 12 MEGA Alternatives in 2024
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is an object storage service with industry-leading scalability, data availability, security, and performance. The service is particularly suitable for enterprise users to manage collect, store, protect, back-up, retrieve, and analyze data.
7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Amazon S3 is short for Amazon Simple Storage Service, a popular web hosting company among developers that also offers object storage service.
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Amazon S3 is referred to as Amazon Simple Storage Service. It is basically a cloud storage service that was initially released in 2006. This product of Amazon Web Services (AWS) handles big data analytics, provides online data backups and helps in web-scale computing.
What are the alternatives to S3?
Sometimes Amazon S3 might not be serving you as you need and need some features or want to move out of the big 3 providers due to charges of which you’re not using much of their services. There are many alternatives to object storage that you can use at a far lower cost than what you pay on Amazon S3. And storing data traditionally can become complicated sometimes, whereby...
Source: www.w6d.io

Google Persistent Disk Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Persistent Disk yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon S3 seems to be a lot more popular than Google Persistent Disk. While we know about 199 links to Amazon S3, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Google Persistent Disk. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon S3 mentions (199)

View more

Google Persistent Disk mentions (2)

  • SSDs Have Become Fast, Except in the Cloud
    This is untrue of Local SSD (https://cloud.google.com/local-ssd) in Google Cloud. Local SSDs are PCIe peripherals. There are also multiple Persistent Disk (https://cloud.google.com/persistent-disk) offerings that are backed by SSDs over the network. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • All your notes are stored in an open, unsecure, and unencryped format on the Remarkable cloud. Just so you know.
    Google uses several layers of encryption to protect customer data at rest. All customer content stored at rest is encrypted, without any action required from the customer, using one or more encryption mechanisms. All data stored in Google Cloud is encrypted at the storage level using AES256, with the exception of a small number of Persistent Disks created before 2015 that use AES128. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon S3 and Google Persistent Disk, you can also consider the following products

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Microsoft Azure Storage - Azure Storage is a durable, scalable cloud storage solution.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

Pure Storage - Pure Storage is an all-flash enterprise storage solution that accelerate random I/O-intensive applications like server virtualization, deskt

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.