Google Open Source
GitHub Sponsors
Open Collective
Disney Open Source
LaunchKit - Open Source
Open Source Alternatives
Code NASA
Open Source @IFTTT
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Google Open Source
ClearbitThis is recommended for developers looking for mature, scalable, and robust open-source solutions. Itโs also ideal for organizations seeking to build upon a reliable foundation of tools, tech enthusiasts eager to learn and contribute to open source projects, and anyone interested in the collaborative world of software development.
No Google Open Source videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Google Open Source might be a bit more popular than Clearbit. We know about 26 links to it since March 2021 and only 18 links to Clearbit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Google Summer of Code (GSoC) is a global program run by Google where students and open source beginners get paid to contribute to open source organizations over a summer. You apply to a specific organization with a project proposal, a mentor reviews it, Google funds the selected contributors, and you spend the coding period working on real software used by real people. It's not an internship at Google โ the org... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Many companies that depend on OSS contribute financially so that the projects remain robust. Examples like Google and Microsoft have shown that corporate sponsorship is not only beneficial for maintainers but also for companies that rely on reliable software. The corporate sponsorship model moves away from traditional ad-based revenue generation, fostering a direct relationship between the sponsor and the... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Similarly, open source projects, which are the backbone of digital infrastructure, have long struggled to achieve sustainable funding. Crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter, Opencollective, and corporate sponsorships from technology giants like Googleโs open source initiatives and Microsoftโs commitment to open source are now offering viable alternatives. Innovators have begun to integrate Non-Fungible Tokens... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Governments, academic institutions, and major tech companies like Microsoft and Google have recognized the importance of financial support. Funding models have evolved to include corporate sponsorships, grants (e.g., Mozilla's Open Source Support Program), and community-driven donations through platforms like GitHub Sponsors and Open Collective. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Sponsorship Programs: Platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and offerings from tech giants like Google Open Source and Microsoft Open Source provide recurring support while maintaining community values. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Disney Open Source - Explore Disney's Open Source projects
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.