
Amazon S3
Azure Blob Storage
DigitalOcean Spaces
Minio
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
DynamoDB
Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Retool
Appsmith
Jet Admin
Motor Admin
Superblocks
windmill.dev
Supabase
1-click Supabase admin panel

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Google Cloud Storage seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 43 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | cloud.google.com | supabricks.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | Startup from Worldwide · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Google Cloud Storage yet.
Supabricks is the instant admin panel for your Supabase database. In just a couple of clicks, you can get an admin panel with: 🔓 Enterprise-grade login 👥 Built-in roles and permissions 🔄 Automatic updates every time your database changes 👉 View the full demo here
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Google Cloud Storage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Walkthrough of Supabricks
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Google Cloud Storage and SupaBricks.
SupaBricks's answer:
Supabricks is the only 1-click admin panel setup for your Supabase databases.
Just connect your Supabase database—no coding, no configs, no drag-and-drop builders. Instantly, you’ve got a ready-to-go, great-looking admin panel that just works out of the box.
It’s fast, effortless, and actually enjoyable to use.
Share your experience with using Google Cloud Storage and SupaBricks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Cloud Storage FUSE mounts a Cloud Storage bucket as a local filesystem. Your code reads and writes files normally, and GCS FUSE translates those operations into Cloud Storage API calls:. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
The cold data storage layer: Data was ultimately stored in Google Cloud Storage (GCS). - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Before deploying, I had to activate the free $300 credits, since some services require billing to be enabled beforehand, such as the Cloud Storage which is used to host my recreated resume as a static website (as part of 4. Static Website). - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Tracking SupaBricks since Aug 2025.
When comparing Google Cloud Storage and SupaBricks, you can also consider the following products.

Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.
Compare Amazon S3 to Google Cloud Storage or SupaBricks:

Build custom internal tools in minutes.
Compare Retool to Google Cloud Storage or SupaBricks:

Use Azure Blob Storage to store all kinds of files. Azure hot, cool, and archive storage is reliable cloud object storage for unstructured data
Compare Azure Blob Storage to Google Cloud Storage or SupaBricks:

Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.
Compare Appsmith to Google Cloud Storage or SupaBricks:

The simplest way to cost effectively store, serve, backup, and archive a virtually infinite amount of media, content, images, and static files for your apps.
Compare DigitalOcean Spaces to Google Cloud Storage or SupaBricks:
