Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Authenticator VS SQL Server 2017

Compare Google Authenticator VS SQL Server 2017 and see what are their differences

Electe
Illuminate the future with AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Google Authenticator logo Google Authenticator

Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

SQL Server 2017 logo SQL Server 2017

Jul 1, 2017 - Learn about tools and services for mobile and paginated Reporting Services reports and Power BI reports on premises.
  • Google Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25
  • SQL Server 2017 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

Google Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Google Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by requiring a second factor of authentication, reducing the risk of unauthorized access even if your password is compromised.
  • Offline Access
    The app does not require an internet connection to generate codes, making it reliable in situations where connectivity is a concern.
  • Compatibility
    Google Authenticator is compatible with a wide range of services and accounts, providing a versatile solution for multi-factor authentication (MFA).
  • Free of Charge
    The application is free to use, offering robust security features without any financial investment.
  • Ease of Use
    Setup and usage are straightforward, making it accessible to users without technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Google Authenticator

  • Device Dependence
    If you lose your device, gaining access to your accounts can become challenging, particularly if you haven't backed up or used alternative methods.
  • No Cloud Sync
    Google Authenticator does not offer a built-in feature for cloud backups, making it difficult to transfer codes to a new device.
  • Single Device Limitation
    The app only works on a single device at a time, which can be inconvenient if you manage multiple devices.
  • No Biometric Lock
    The app lacks advanced security features such as biometric locks, which are present in some other authenticator apps.
  • Limited Recovery Options
    In case of losing access to the app, recovery options rely heavily on the user having access to backup codes, which might not always be accessible.

SQL Server 2017 features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    SQL Server 2017 offers cross-platform support, enabling it to run on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers, providing flexibility and integration into various environments.
  • Graph Database Capabilities
    Introduces graph database capabilities, allowing the modeling of complex data relationships easily and efficiently, expanding its use cases.
  • Advanced Analytics
    Integrates with Microsoft R and Python services, facilitating advanced analytics and machine learning directly within the database, which helps organizations to perform sophisticated data analysis.
  • Adaptive Query Processing
    Includes adaptive query processing features to optimize query performance automatically, improving application speed and efficiency.
  • Enhanced Security
    SQL Server 2017 continues to enhance security with features like Always Encrypted, Dynamic Data Masking, and Row-Level Security to protect sensitive data.

Possible disadvantages of SQL Server 2017

  • Cost
    Licensing and support costs for SQL Server can be relatively high, particularly for enterprise editions, which may not be cost-effective for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity
    SQL Server 2017 includes a vast array of features and configurations that can introduce complexity, requiring substantial expertise to manage and optimize.
  • Resource Intensive
    Requires significant system resources for optimal performance, which may necessitate additional investment in hardware to operate efficiently at scale.
  • Limited NoSQL Functionality
    While SQL Server 2017 introduces some NoSQL features through its support for JSON and graph databases, it still lags behind dedicated NoSQL databases in terms of flexibility and scalability for unstructured data.
  • Version-Specific Features
    Some advanced features are only available in the latest versions or specific editions, which may necessitate upgrades or specific licensing to access the full capabilities, leading to additional expenses.

Analysis of Google Authenticator

Overall verdict

  • Google Authenticator is generally considered a good option for those looking to enhance the security of their online accounts. Its ease of use and offline functionality are significant advantages. However, users should be aware that it does not automatically back up tokens, so itโ€™s important to save backup codes or have a recovery plan.

Why this product is good

  • Google Authenticator is a widely used app for enabling two-factor authentication (2FA), which adds an additional layer of security to online accounts. It is valued for its simplicity, reliability, and the fact that it does not require an internet connection to function, as it generates time-based one-time passwords (TOTPs). This makes it a robust choice for enhancing security.

Recommended for

  • Individuals looking for a straightforward and effective way to implement 2FA.
  • Users who prefer an app that doesn't require an internet connection to function.
  • People concerned with enhancing online security for their personal or professional accounts.

Google Authenticator videos

+ Add

How to Use Google Authenticator

More videos:

  • Review - GOOGLE AUTHENTICATOR vs. AUTHY - (AUTHY WON)

SQL Server 2017 videos

+ Add

SQL Server 2017 โ€“ Everything you need to know

More videos:

  • Review - SQL Server 2017 Features

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Authenticator and SQL Server 2017)

Google Authenticator

SQL Server 2017

Identity And Access Management
100 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100
Two Factor Authentication
100 100%
Two Factor Authentication
0% 0
Data Visualization
0 0%
Data Visualization
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Authenticator and SQL Server 2017. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Authenticator and SQL Server 2017

Google Authenticator Reviews

7 Best Google Authenticator Alternatives For Android And iOS
Except for one, all the apps mentioned above are available for Android and iPhone. You can add accounts which you want to secure by scanning their barcode or simply entering the secret key or id in all of them. Some of them will let you capture a screenshot and some of them will not. Apart from that, all these are free to use and provide better features making them as the...
Source: www.techuntold.com
The Best Authenticator Apps for 2023
When you use Google Authenticator to log in to your Google account, you enter the six-digit code shown in the authenticator app, just as you would to log in to any other service. The app also lets you import logins from an old phone to a new one if you have the former on hand. As with Microsoft Authenticator, there's no Apple Watch app or even an Android Wear app for Google...
Source: www.pcmag.com
Top 6 Google Authenticator Alternatives in 2023
Although they arenโ€™t as big or widely known as Google or Microsoft, Twilioโ€™s Authy app is one of the most impressive and feature-rich Google Authenticator alternatives. Twilio takes pride in the fact that their app can be used anywhere Google Authenticator can be used, meaning that those making the switch wonโ€™t hit any unexpected compatibility issues.
Source: www.techrepublic.com
Is Authy better than Google Authenticator?
The difference between Authy and Google Authenticator lies in the number of features offered by each app. If you like minimalism, use Google Authenticator, but if you like multi-device support, full Backup of your 2FA codes, or three authentication types, use Authy.
Source: shieldplanet.com
The Best 2FA Apps 2021: Locking Down Your Online Accounts
Google Authenticator is really the baseline here, because nearly all sites that support 2FA support Googleรขย€ย™s app as well. For example, LastPass Authenticator and Authy arenรขย€ย™t explicitly supported by as many sites and services. However, they still use TOTP, making them compatible with all services that support Google Authenticator.
Source: www.cloudwards.net

SQL Server 2017 Reviews

We have no reviews of SQL Server 2017 yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Authenticator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Authenticator mentions (8)

  • The Complete WordPress Security Guide for Small Business Owners (2026)
    Download an authenticator app (Google Authenticator, Authy, or Microsoft Authenticator). - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Google Authenticator now supports Google Account synchronization
    Here they have support page https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • I'm building a macOS app in a week with Tauri and Supabase.
    Many authenticator apps already exist on Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Most of them have synchronization features but are limited to backup only or sync with the same platform (ie: iOS or Android only). I'm using one of them for years and at this moment I'm feeling bothered when switching to a mobile device every time login into a website or online service. So, I created Otentik Authenticator. A Google... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Ask HN: How to enable 2FA for Google Account to use Authenticator app?
    Their only docs suggest using an authenticator app (which presumably runs on the 'phone which potentially can be lost' anyway) is possible: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447?hl=en&ref_topic=2954345 If it's not showing up for you, you'd need to contact their support team to find out why. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Bought Centric Swap / CNS? Hereโ€™s What To Do Next
    By the way, if you donโ€™t already have 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) set up on your Centric Wallet, now would be a good time to do that. Youโ€™ll need to have a 2FA app installed on your smartphone, such as Google Authenticator or Authy. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

SQL Server 2017 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SQL Server 2017 yet. Tracking of SQL Server 2017 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Authenticator and SQL Server 2017, you can also consider the following products

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

JasperReports - JasperReports Server is a stand-alone and embeddable reporting server.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duoโ€™s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Telerik Reporting - Deliver Reports to Any Application. Add reports to any business application. View reports on mobile devices and in web, desktop and cloud apps. Export reports to any format.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication - Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.

Pentaho - Pentaho is a Business Intelligence software company that offers Pentaho Business Analytics, a suite...

Loading...