Table of contents
Enhanced Security
Google Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by requiring a second factor of authentication, reducing the risk of unauthorized access even if your password is compromised.
Offline Access
The app does not require an internet connection to generate codes, making it reliable in situations where connectivity is a concern.
Compatibility
Google Authenticator is compatible with a wide range of services and accounts, providing a versatile solution for multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Free of Charge
The application is free to use, offering robust security features without any financial investment.
Ease of Use
Setup and usage are straightforward, making it accessible to users without technical expertise.
Promote Google Authenticator. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Google Authenticator is generally considered a good option for those looking to enhance the security of their online accounts. Its ease of use and offline functionality are significant advantages. However, users should be aware that it does not automatically back up tokens, so it’s important to save backup codes or have a recovery plan.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Google Authenticator is good.
Check the traffic stats of Google Authenticator on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Google Authenticator on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Google Authenticator's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Google Authenticator on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Google Authenticator on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Here they have support page https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Many authenticator apps already exist on Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Most of them have synchronization features but are limited to backup only or sync with the same platform (ie: iOS or Android only). I'm using one of them for years and at this moment I'm feeling bothered when switching to a mobile device every time login into a website or online service. So, I created Otentik Authenticator. A Google... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Their only docs suggest using an authenticator app (which presumably runs on the 'phone which potentially can be lost' anyway) is possible: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447?hl=en&ref_topic=2954345 If it's not showing up for you, you'd need to contact their support team to find out why. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
By the way, if you don’t already have 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) set up on your Centric Wallet, now would be a good time to do that. You’ll need to have a 2FA app installed on your smartphone, such as Google Authenticator or Authy. Source: over 3 years ago
Use 2FA with Google Authenticator for your email, wallets, and pretty much anything else that allows you to do so. Source: almost 4 years ago
If you own a mobile device, but don’t always have access to data/wi-fi, you can use the Google authenticator installed on the device. https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1066447. Source: almost 4 years ago
The most common MFA methods utilize OTPs via SMS (which are not as secure as they seem to be) or an authenticator application, such as the Google Authenticator app, or a modern password manager (such as Bitwarden or 1Password). - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Google Authenticator stands as a foundational player in the realm of two-factor and multi-factor authentication. Its primary role is to provide users with an additional layer of security by generating time-based one-time passwords (TOTPs) used in conjunction with traditional passwords. Despite being widely regarded as a robust and reliable solution, public opinion reveals a mix of appreciation and critique reflecting its usability, feature set, and competitive landscape.
The app boasts widespread support across diverse online platforms, making it a go-to choice for many seeking to enhance their digital security. As noted in its adoption by many websites, it is reliable for users heavily integrated with Google services. This universality marks it as a baseline in the field, ensuring compatibility where some alternatives may not be explicitly supported.
However, Google Authenticator's minimalist design, while suiting those who prioritize simplicity, limits its appeal compared to feature-rich counterparts. User feedback often highlights the lack of multi-device synchronization as a significant drawback. Although recent developments have introduced account synchronization, issues with device-specific limitations persist. Users who transition to new devices face the inconvenience of manually transferring their credentials, which can opt them towards alternatives like Authy, which offers seamless backup and multi-device functionality.
Competitors such as Authy, Microsoft Authenticator, and others offer additional features, leading users to consider switching. Apps like Authy not only provide multi-device support but also integrate desktop versions and wearable tech applications, offering versatile access that Google Authenticator does not presently match. Microsoft Authenticator appeals particularly to users deeply embedded in Microsoft’s ecosystem, drawing parallels between the competitive dynamics of both platforms with their respective authenticators.
Recent updates introduced by Google have started to address some longstanding criticisms, such as supporting sync options. However, community discourse reflects ongoing concerns regarding Google Authenticator's adoption of features that have become standard among its competitors. Discussions in various forums and articles indicate a pivot in user expectations towards more integrated and flexible authentication solutions.
In conclusion, Google Authenticator remains a vital part of the identity and access management spectrum, appreciated for its simplicity and extensive support across platforms. Yet, as feature demands evolve, it faces increasing competition from apps that provide enhanced utility and user control. The evolving market dynamics signal a need for continued innovation from Google to retain user loyalty and address the desirability of advanced functionalities seen in competitor offerings.
Do you know an article comparing Google Authenticator to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Google Authenticator good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Google Authenticator here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
