Google Antigravity
Cursor
Claude Code
warp by spolu
Codex 3.0 by OpenAI
Windsurf Editor
opencode
GitHub Copilot
DevPrism
LinearB
Swarmia
Typo
Faros.ai
Hatica
Waydev
DevPrism is an engineering intelligence platform for engineering managers, VPs of Engineering and CTOs who need a factual view of how their teams deliver software.
It connects to the tools a team already uses - GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jira, Linear, SonarQube and Codacy - and computes DORA delivery metrics, the SPACE framework and developer experience surveys. There is no data pipeline to build and nothing to install on developer machines.
On top of those metrics it correlates three axes that are usually measured separately: delivery speed, product quality (churn, duplication, coverage, code smells) and the cost of AI coding assistants such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex and Devin Desktop. Spend is reported per pull request and per team rather than as a licence total.
Beyond dashboards, DevPrism acts on what it finds. It predicts which pull requests are likely to stall by comparing them against the team's own velocity baseline, detects quality regressions, and applies policies that write back to GitHub, Azure DevOps or GitLab - in suggest, approve or automatic mode, at the level of autonomy the organisation chooses. Alerts and weekly digests are delivered to Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat or email.
The interface is available in English, French, Spanish and German. Data is hosted in the European Union and the platform is GDPR native. A free plan covers up to seven managed contributors, human or AI, with no credit card required.
Google Antigravity DevPrismNo DevPrism videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
DevPrism's answer:
Engineering leadership in software organisations that have already rolled out AI coding assistants: VPs of Engineering, CTOs and Engineering Managers who are asked to justify the spend and to show what changed in delivery and quality.
Platform and developer experience teams use it too, for the delivery metrics and the developer experience surveys. It fits teams from a handful of developers on the free plan up to several hundred contributors.
DevPrism's answer:
Three axes that usually live in separate tools are correlated on the same data: delivery speed (DORA), product quality (churn, duplication, coverage, code smells) and the cost of AI coding assistants, reported per pull request rather than as a licence total.
The second part is what the correlation is for. Agents investigate why a metric moved, and a policy engine can act on the answer - assigning a reviewer, flagging a risky pull request, escalating a stale one - writing back to GitHub, Azure DevOps or GitLab at the level of autonomy the organisation grants, from observation only to automatic remediation.
Pricing follows managed entities rather than headcount: humans, AI assistant seats and autonomous agents are counted separately, because not every contributor is a person any more.
DevPrism's answer:
Because the question most teams now have is not "how fast do we ship" but "what did the AI investment change, and what did it cost". DevPrism answers it on your own data: adoption of GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex and Devin Desktop next to delivery metrics, quality signals and token spend, per team and per period.
It also acts. Beyond dashboards, a policy engine applies rules in three execution modes - suggest, act with approval, or act automatically - with dry run enabled by default, so automation is introduced at the pace the organisation is comfortable with.
Practical points: a free plan for up to seven managed contributors with no credit card, an interface in English, French, Spanish and German, and hosting in the European Union with a GDPR native design.
DevPrism's answer:
It started from a gap encountered while leading engineering teams. Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code get rolled out, productivity feels better, and then someone asks for the return on the investment - and there is nothing to show. Suggestion acceptance rate measures usage, not impact, and no dashboard connects AI usage to delivery outcomes.
Meanwhile the data already exists, scattered across GitHub, Jira, SonarQube and the assistants themselves, and teams rebuild the same spreadsheet every quarter. DevPrism was built to bring those sources together and, past the measurement, to act on what they reveal.
DevPrism's answer:
Backend in C# on .NET, with ASP.NET Core minimal APIs, Entity Framework Core, MediatR and Hangfire for background processing. PostgreSQL with the pgvector extension stores both relational data and embeddings for semantic search; Redis handles distributed caching.
The web application is React with TypeScript, built with Vite and styled with Tailwind CSS. Everything runs on Azure Container Apps in the France Central region, orchestrated with .NET Aspire.
Based on our record, Google Antigravity seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I used Antigravity with Gemini and the Sentry MCP. Not to generate the PR. To sit next to the issue list and ask what was actually mine. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
This landing page looks like a cheap ripoff of google's antigravity: https://antigravity.google/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Google Antigravity and OpenAI Codex are the two most capable AI coding agents in wide use in 2026, and they answer the same question in opposite ways: where should an autonomous coding agent live and do its work. Antigravity rebuilds the IDE around agents and keeps the developer in the loop visually. Codex moves the agent into a cloud sandbox and returns a finished pull request. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
The step up from there is an editor with a built-in agent like Cursor, Google Antigravity, Windsurf, or VS Code with a coding extension. These are code editors with an AI agent living inside them, and the difference is the responsible party for getting things from place to place. Instead of the software creator shuttling code between windows, the AI agent edits the project files directly and runs the GitHub and... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
If you were similarly flashbanged by the Antigravity 2.0 update, here is a complete breakdown of what Google changed, the data behind the new features, why it broke our setups, and the exact steps I used to repair my workspace. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
LinearB - LinearB delivers software leaders the insights they need to make their engineering teams better through a real-time SaaS platform. Visibility into key metrics paired with automated improvement actions enables software leaders to deliver more.
Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโno more context switching, just breakthrough results.
Swarmia - Swarmia is an engineering productivity software trusted by 600+ engineering teams worldwide. Use key engineering metrics to unblock the flow, align engineering with business objectives, and drive continuous improvement.
warp by spolu - Secure and simple terminal sharing
Typo - Your all-in-one engineering intelligence platform to optimise software delivery - Better Code, Faster Deployments, Productive Dev Teams!