Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Antigravity VS Boxes.dev

Compare Google Antigravity VS Boxes.dev and see what are their differences

Google Antigravity logo Google Antigravity

Google Antigravity - Build the new way

Boxes.dev logo Boxes.dev

Run Claude Code and Codex in your own cloud environment
  • Google Antigravity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-11-18
Not present

Google Antigravity features and specs

  • Innovative Technology
    Google Antigravity introduces groundbreaking technology that potentially revolutionizes the way we understand physics and gravity.
  • Increased Mobility
    If successful, antigravity technology could allow for unprecedented levels of mobility, enabling new forms of transportation and logistics.
  • Environmental Benefits
    By potentially reducing the need for traditional fossil fuel-based transportation, antigravity technology could have significant positive impacts on the environment.
  • Economic Opportunities
    This technology could create new industries and job opportunities, fostering economic growth and development.

Possible disadvantages of Google Antigravity

  • High Cost
    The development and implementation of antigravity technology are likely to require significant investment, making it expensive and potentially inaccessible to many.
  • Technological Challenges
    Antigravity involves complex scientific principles that may present formidable technological challenges and limit its feasibility.
  • Ethical Concerns
    The introduction of antigravity technology may raise ethical questions, such as its impact on society and potential misuse in military applications.
  • Regulatory Hurdles
    Bringing antigravity technology to market would require navigating numerous regulatory environments, which could delay its deployment.

Boxes.dev features and specs

  • Instant macOS Development Environments
    Boxes.dev allows developers to quickly spin up macOS virtual machines for development purposes, significantly reducing the time needed to set up clean development environments compared to manual configuration.
  • Native Apple Silicon Support
    Boxes.dev is built to run natively on Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) Macs, leveraging the Apple Virtualization framework for near-native performance without the overhead of traditional emulation.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    The app provides a streamlined, user-friendly interface for creating and managing macOS virtual machines, making virtualization accessible even to developers who aren't familiar with complex VM tooling.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    Boxes.dev offers the ability to create environments with development tools pre-installed or easily configurable, saving developers significant setup time when they need fresh or isolated macOS instances.
  • Snapshot and Restore Capabilities
    Users can take snapshots of their virtual machines and restore them to previous states, which is invaluable for testing, CI/CD workflows, and safely experimenting with system configurations without risk.

Possible disadvantages of Boxes.dev

  • macOS Only
    Boxes.dev is limited to macOS host machines and macOS guest VMs, making it unsuitable for developers who need to run Linux or Windows virtual machines or who work on non-Apple hardware.
  • Paid Software
    Boxes.dev is a commercial product that requires a purchase, which may be a barrier for individual developers or small teams, especially when free alternatives like UTM or raw QEMU exist.
  • Apple Silicon Requirement
    The app primarily targets Apple Silicon Macs, which means developers still using older Intel-based Macs may have limited functionality or may not be able to use the tool at all.
  • Relatively New Product
    As a relatively newer entrant in the virtualization space, Boxes.dev has a smaller community and fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations compared to established tools like Parallels or VMware Fusion.
  • Limited OS Version Support
    Users are generally limited to running macOS versions that Apple's Virtualization framework supports as guests, which can restrict the ability to test on older macOS versions that may still be relevant for compatibility testing.

Analysis of Google Antigravity

Overall verdict

  • Google Antigravity is a promising agent-first development platform that reimagines the coding workflow around autonomous AI agents, making it a strong choice for developers who want to leverage Google's Gemini models in an IDE built for the agentic era.

Why this product is good

  • Built around an agent-centric approach, allowing AI agents to autonomously plan, execute, and validate coding tasks across the editor, terminal, and browser
  • Powered by Google's advanced Gemini models, offering strong reasoning and code generation capabilities
  • Provides a mission-control style interface where developers can orchestrate and monitor multiple agents working in parallel
  • Agents can produce verifiable artifacts like task lists, screenshots, and browser recordings to build trust in their output
  • Free to use during its public preview period, lowering the barrier to entry for experimentation

Recommended for

  • Developers who want to embrace agentic, AI-driven coding workflows
  • Teams already invested in Google's Gemini and AI ecosystem
  • Engineers looking to automate repetitive coding, testing, and browser-based tasks
  • Early adopters interested in exploring the future of AI-assisted software development
  • Individuals wanting to experiment with autonomous agents at no cost during the preview

Analysis of Boxes.dev

Overall verdict

  • Boxes.dev appears to be a solid developer-focused tool that streamlines workflows, though its overall value depends on your specific technical needs and team size.

Why this product is good

  • Developer-centric design that integrates smoothly into existing coding workflows
  • Aims to reduce setup and configuration overhead so teams can focus on building
  • Modern, clean interface that appeals to technical users
  • Potential for improved collaboration and faster project spin-up

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineering teams looking to simplify their tooling
  • Startups needing to move quickly with minimal infrastructure setup
  • Technical users who value streamlined, code-first workflows
  • Small to mid-sized teams seeking better collaboration on development projects

Google Antigravity videos

I Tried Google Antigravity So You Don't Have To!

More videos:

  • Review - Is Google Antigravity Better Than Cursor 2.0?

Boxes.dev videos

No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Antigravity and Boxes.dev)
Developer Tools
95 95%
5% 5
AI
95 95%
5% 5
Coding
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Antigravity and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Antigravity seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 37 links to Google Antigravity, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Boxes.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Antigravity mentions (37)

  • I Already Had Sentry. Then an iPhone from 2018 White-Screened My Karaoke App.
    I used Antigravity with Gemini and the Sentry MCP. Not to generate the PR. To sit next to the issue list and ask what was actually mine. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • Kimi Work
    This landing page looks like a cheap ripoff of google's antigravity: https://antigravity.google/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Google Antigravity vs OpenAI Codex - Which AI coding agent is better?
    Google Antigravity and OpenAI Codex are the two most capable AI coding agents in wide use in 2026, and they answer the same question in opposite ways: where should an autonomous coding agent live and do its work. Antigravity rebuilds the IDE around agents and keeps the developer in the loop visually. Codex moves the agent into a cloud sandbox and returns a finished pull request. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to Get Your First Tool Online
    The step up from there is an editor with a built-in agent like Cursor, Google Antigravity, Windsurf, or VS Code with a coding extension. These are code editors with an AI agent living inside them, and the difference is the responsible party for getting things from place to place. Instead of the software creator shuttling code between windows, the AI agent edits the project files directly and runs the GitHub and... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Surviving the Antigravity 2.0 Update: How Google Broke My Workflow (And How to Fix It)
    If you were similarly flashbanged by the Antigravity 2.0 update, here is a complete breakdown of what Google changed, the data behind the new features, why it broke our setups, and the exact steps I used to repair my workspace. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

Boxes.dev mentions (2)

  • Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
    Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact use case. Some other ones worth a look are Factory Droid and Amp Orbs. Those two build their own agent harness (like Cursor), whereas with boxes.dev we run the native codex and... - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago
  • Mitchellh starts a new company: Superlogical
    These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial to set up and manage. I'm working this with https://boxes.dev - a workspace for launching and managing claude + codex sessions, each running in its own cloud devbox. We launched... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Antigravity and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Codesphere - Deploy in less than 5s

Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโ€”no more context switching, just breakthrough results.

AppWizzy - Build scalable web apps and websites with AI that serve you for years. Professional vibe-coding platform. Perfect to build SaaS, intenal tool, AI tool, business app, etc

warp by spolu - Secure and simple terminal sharing

InstaVM - Instant computers for AI agents