Google Analytics
Matomo
Mixpanel
Plausible.io
Clicky
Adobe Analytics
Hotjar
Fathom Analytics
LaunchAmp.eu
Testimonial.to
EmbedSocial
Famewall.io
Elfsight
Poper.ai
JustReview
BrandBird
676 products launch on Product Hunt every day. Being featured took 133 upvotes on a typical measured day, and rank 100 sits at five โ so most launches finish in single digits, decided in the week before by founders nobody gave the numbers to.
So we count them. Every launch day, on several launch platforms, read after it closes and kept: how big the field was, what the winner scored, what each placement down the ranking cost. Not a survey, not an estimate, not a round number from a blog post. One more day on file every day.
Out of that comes the pre-launch review (79 โฌ, written within 48 hours). It starts with the question almost nobody asks: which platform your launch belongs on. Launch platforms differ by more than an order of magnitude in field size and in what a visible placement costs โ with the reach you actually have, one of those rooms is winnable and the others are not. Then the date, the tagline, the thumbnail, the topics, and your first maker comment written out as a draft, plus an honest number for what your launch will realistically do. Sometimes that number says: wait until you have a list.
You pay only after we accept, and we take a limited number a week. A review that lands after your launch is worth nothing, so a date we cannot make is declined rather than sold.
After a launch there is Launch Proof (12,99 โฌ once): Product Hunt gives you a badge with your upvote count, but not the sentences people wrote. Launch Proof puts your real comments, your rating and your placement in the day onto your own page as embeds, and generates two social graphics with your actual numbers on them. Live for 90 days, then frozen and still working.
Free and without signup: put any Product Hunt launch against the full field of the day it ran in.
One-time payments only, no subscription for either product. No claim that any of it gets you upvotes โ the Terms rule that out in a section of their own. No third-party scripts and no cookie banner on any public page.
Google Analytics LaunchAmp.euNo LaunchAmp.eu videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
Because there is no measurement behind the alternatives.
Launch advice is either a checklist written from memory or a directory that wants your submission. Neither has counted anything. We can tell you what a placement cost on the days we measured, and we tell you which days those were and how many of them there are.
Because it happens before the launch. After launch day, everything is observation. The one point at which the outcome can still change is the week before, and that is where the review sits.
Because you pay after we accept. Nothing is charged until we confirm we can make your date, and we take a limited number a week. A review that arrives after your launch is worth nothing, so a date we cannot make gets declined instead of sold.
Because it will tell you not to. The verdict is allowed to say your reach is too small for the room you picked, or that this launch should wait. A service that always says "looks good" is worthless in exactly the community its customers live in.
Because nothing here is a subscription. A launch is an event. Both products are bought once and nothing renews.
And on the after-launch half: take Product Hunt's free badge if the number is all you want. They hand one out that carries the live upvote count, and we verified against their API that it matches. What it does not carry is the comments, the rating, or any placement below the top few of a day โ that is what Launch Proof is for, at 12,99 โฌ once.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
It started as the smaller half of what it is now: a launch produces proof for about 48 hours and then goes quiet, and almost every founder leaves it on someone else's website. Building that turned into a long argument with the temptation to fake things. The first version printed "[Your customer review will appear here]" on a quote card and turned URL slugs into product names โ it would have shipped a card reading "PAZI 2" for a product called Pazi. Everything invented came out, and what replaced it was a rule: if the data is not there, say so.
The rule cost features. Comment authors had to be dropped entirely once we verified that Product Hunt's API anonymises them, because a guessed name would attribute a real sentence to the wrong person. Reach and conversion claims came off every page because we could not measure them.
Then in August 2026 Product Hunt started handing out a free badge carrying the live upvote count. Measured the same day, it matched their API exactly. Half of what the paid product argued for was suddenly free, and four pages on this site said "ours updates, theirs does not". They were rewritten within hours, including one that now tells the reader to take Product Hunt's badge if the number is all they want.
That was the useful shock. The thing we had built quietly along the way โ a record of every launch day, read after it closed โ turned out to be the part nobody else had. Counting the second platform showed the real finding: the platforms are not variations of each other, they are different orders of magnitude, and a launch that would vanish in one can win another with the same audience. Most of the work was finding out which platforms can be measured at all; several well-known ones cannot, and are not in the tables for that reason rather than for a flattering one.
So the site turned around. The measurement is the business now, the judgement written out of it is what is sold, and the proof embeds are the small thing at the other end of the same launch.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
We count the launch days ourselves, and the first thing we tell you is where to launch.
Every piece of launch advice you can find assumes the room is already decided and argues about the furniture โ the date, the tagline, the thumbnail. But launch platforms differ by more than an order of magnitude in how many products they take a day and in what a visible placement costs there. With the reach a founder can actually bring, one of those rooms is winnable and the others are not. That is the decision that matters most, it is made once, and almost nobody makes it deliberately, because almost nobody has counted.
So we count. Every launch day, on several launch platforms, read after it has closed and kept: how big the field was, what the winner scored, what each placement down the ranking cost. One more day on file every day. It is not a survey, not an estimate and not a round number from a blog post โ it is the day as it happened.
The paid review is that measurement turned into a judgement about one specific product. Not a table you have to interpret: given the reach you have, this is the platform where your launch can place, this is what your date is worth, this is what it will realistically do. Sometimes the answer is to wait until you have a list, and that answer gets sent.
We do not publish the tables. A founder deciding where to launch gets more out of a verdict written against their own product than out of a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet is the part we did the work for.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
Solo founders and small teams about to launch โ indie hackers, bootstrapped SaaS, developer tools โ plus everyone planning a second attempt at a launch that went quietly the first time.
The common situation is narrow and it is worth stating plainly: you get one launch day, you get one shot at the room and the date, and nobody has told you what the field looks like. 676 products enter Product Hunt on a typical measured day. Being featured took 133 upvotes. Rank 100 sits at five. Most launches therefore finish in single digits, and most of what decides that was settled in the week before by a founder nobody gave the numbers to.
That includes โ in fact especially โ founders whose last launch disappointed them. The free launch check often shows a launch its owner had written off finishing ahead of 80% of its day. The review exists so the next one is aimed at a room it can win.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
PHP 8 with PDO on MySQL/MariaDB โ no framework, no build step on the server. Product Hunt's GraphQL API v2 for launch data, and the public APIs of several other launch platforms for the daily measurement, aggregated into our own tables. Stripe Checkout for payments. PHP GD with FreeType renders the social graphics server-side. The embeds are 34 KB of vanilla JavaScript with no dependencies and no cookies. Tailwind CSS is compiled and committed; Alpine.js is self-hosted. Hosted in Germany.
The self-hosting is deliberate rather than incidental: public pages make zero third-party requests, so no visitor's IP address is handed to a CDN and no consent banner is needed on any page we serve.
LaunchAmp.eu's answer:
LaunchAmp is newly launched and has no customers to name yet.
All the golden insights in one place fro all your store and sites etc , amazing app by google
Based on our record, Google Analytics seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Letโs discuss Google Analytics in particular and other tools in general, which are available online to measure the website performance. Source: almost 3 years ago
Google Analytics: A free tool from Google that provides in-depth website analytics and performance metrics, including traffic sources, user behavior, and conversions. Source: almost 3 years ago
Automating your affiliate marketing has a clear advantage: scalability. As your affiliate network grows, manual management becomes difficult. Automation makes it easier to handle a larger volume of affiliates, communicate with them, and monitor their performance. This means that your affiliate program can grow without sacrificing efficiency. You can also use automation tools to track and report affiliate... Source: almost 3 years ago
Google Analytics: It provides in-depth insights into website traffic, user behavior, conversions, and other important metrics. Source: about 3 years ago
Implement a robust website analytics tool, such as Google Analytics, to track key metrics and gather insights about user behavior. Set up goals and conversion tracking to measure the impact of your website redesign or migration on your business objectives. Source: about 3 years ago
Matomo - Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform
Testimonial.to - Collect video testimonials in the simplest way
Mixpanel - Mixpanel is the most advanced analytics platform in the world for mobile & web.
EmbedSocial - EmbedAlbum tool allows users to embed their Facebook, Instagram and Twitter photo albums on their blogs or websites.
Plausible.io - Plausible Analytics is a simple, open-source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics. Made and hosted in the EU, powered by European-owned cloud infrastructure ๐ช๐บ
Famewall.io - Famewall helps you collect text, video and audio testimonials from customers easily display them with widgets, wall of fame page links and images with no-code to get more customers!