GNU Make VS sshuttle

• Portability
  GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
• Dependency Management
  It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
• Open Source
  Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
• Wide Adoption
  It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
• Efficiency
  GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Syntax
  The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
• Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
  While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
• Steep Learning Curve
  Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
• Debugging Difficulty
  Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
• Performance Bottlenecks
  For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

• Simplicity
  sshuttle is easy to set up and use, requiring minimal configuration. It leverages SSH, a tool that many are already familiar with.
• No Root Access Required
  sshuttle can be used without root access on the client side, making it accessible in environments where administrative privileges are restricted.
• Cross-Platform
  sshuttle works on multiple operating systems including Linux and macOS, providing flexibility in different environments.
• Compatibility
  As it operates at the IP level, sshuttle can work with any program and command-line tools that interact over TCP/IP without requiring any changes.
• Security
  Utilizes SSH's encryption mechanisms, ensuring data is securely tunneled between the client and the server.

Possible disadvantages

• Performance
  While convenient, sshuttle may not perform as well as more specialized VPN solutions, especially under heavy network load.
• Limited Features
  Compared to dedicated VPN software, sshuttle lacks advanced features such as traffic shaping, advanced logging, and fine-grained access controls.
• No UDP Support
  sshuttle primarily supports TCP, and has limited support for UDP, which may be a drawback for applications that rely heavily on UDP.
• Dependency on SSH Servers
  Requires a functional SSH server at the remote end, which may not always be feasible or permitted in all network configurations.
• Complex Networks
  Handling complex network environments may get tricky. More sophisticated routing configurations or VPN setups can better manage such cases.

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Hak5 1224.1, SShuttle and Linux Talk

More videos

Tracking GNU Make since Mar 2021.

• A Practical Guide to SSH Tunnels: Local and Remote Port Forwarding

  Need to mention sshuttle [0] here, as it magically solves a bunch of these problems without constant reconfiguration [0] https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Ask HN: The government of my country blocked VPN access. What should I use?

  As a quick solution before implementing the more sophisticated suggestions in this thread, you can try getting a small cheap VPS from somewhere outside and trafficking all your traffic through it via sshuttle[1]. For example, Vultr (not... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• The New Internet

  Hopefully referring to the (excellent) sshuttle: https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle ... Which allows you to turn any system you have an ssh login on into a VPN endpoint. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

View more