Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS BrowserStack

Compare GNU Make VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

GNU Make

Website
gnu.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Analysis of GNU Make

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GNU Make is a robust and reliable tool for managing build processes. Its long-established reputation and widespread use in both open-source and commercial projects underline its effectiveness and flexibility.

Why this product is good

  • GNU Make is widely used because it automates the build process, efficiently handling dependencies and detecting minimal sets of changes in source files. It is highly customizable, supports non-recursive builds, and integrates well into various development environments.

Recommended for

  • Software developers working on C/C++ projects
  • Teams looking to automate build processes
  • Projects that require cross-platform build capabilities
  • Developers who prefer command-line tools
  • Open-source project maintainers

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and BrowserStack)

GNU Make

BrowserStack

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNU Make and BrowserStack

GNU Make Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Make yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...