Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GlusterFS VS PostGraphile

Compare GlusterFS VS PostGraphile and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

PostGraphile logo PostGraphile

GraphQL API for Postgres
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • PostGraphile Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-23

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

PostGraphile features and specs

  • Automatic API Generation
    PostGraphile automatically generates a GraphQL API from a PostgreSQL database, simplifying the development process by eliminating the need to manually create API endpoints.
  • Efficient Performance
    PostGraphile is optimized for performance, offering features like query planning and batching to ensure that it handles large and complex queries efficiently.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The tool enables rapid prototyping by quickly turning a database schema into a working API, which is useful for testing ideas and building MVPs.
  • Feature Rich
    PostGraphile supports various advanced features out-of-the-box, such as real-time updates with subscriptions, advanced filtering, and pagination.
  • Strong PostgreSQL Integration
    Being specifically designed for PostgreSQL, PostGraphile provides deep integration with PostgreSQL features, making it possible to leverage database functions, views, and security features directly.

Possible disadvantages of PostGraphile

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, PostGraphile can be complex to learn, especially for developers unfamiliar with PostgreSQL or GraphQL, due to its extensive configuration options and feature set.
  • Limited to PostgreSQL
    PostGraphile is designed to work specifically with PostgreSQL, which means it cannot be used with other databases like MySQL or MongoDB, limiting its applicability in diverse tech stacks.
  • Overhead for Simple Applications
    For simple applications, the advanced features and automatic generation can create unnecessary overhead, potentially complicating simple CRUD operations.
  • Less Control Over SQL
    Since automatic GraphQL generation is based on the database schema, developers may have less fine-grained control over the SQL queries that are generated, which can be a limitation for highly optimized or specific query requirements.
  • Dependency on Database Schema
    Changes in the database schema directly affect the API, which can be a drawback if the schema evolves frequently, requiring more cautious database management to ensure API stability.

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

PostGraphile videos

Full-Stack Developer talks PostGraphile, GraphQL, Angular and Philosophy of Developing!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and PostGraphile)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Realtime Backend / API
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
GraphQL
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and PostGraphile. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS should be more popular than PostGraphile. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: about 5 years ago

PostGraphile mentions (1)

  • [Question] What will it take to create an automated graphQL API with Elixir?
    There are tools like Hasura/Haskell, Postgraphile/Node.js or Graphjin/Golang that could generate an automatic graphQL API from a Postgres database. Im new to Elixir and really love it. I wonder if there is anything similar these. I heard about Absinthe for graphQL, however as far as I understand it requires to write your own resolvers. What will it take to create a similar tool in Elixir like the one stated above?... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and PostGraphile, you can also consider the following products

rkt - App Container runtime

Hasura - Hasura is an open platform to build scalable app backends, offering a built-in database, search, user-management and more.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

GraphQL - GraphQL is a data query language and runtime to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Oracle PL/SQL - PL/SQL is Oracle's procedural extension to industry-standard SQL.