Software Alternatives & Startups

GlusterFS VS Mirantis OpenStack

Compare GlusterFS VS Mirantis OpenStack and see what are their differences

GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Mirantis OpenStack

Mirantis OpenStack is the most progressive, flexible, and open distribution, delivering core OpenStack, related projects, and third-party plug-ins.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Cloud Storage popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
95 vs 16

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GlusterFS
Mirantis OpenStack
Website gluster.org mirantis.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GlusterFS 6 features
Mirantis OpenStack 5 features
  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.
  • Kubernetes Integration
    Mirantis OpenStack is designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes, which modernizes the deployment of OpenStack by leveraging Kubernetes as an orchestration layer.
  • Scalability
    Mirantis OpenStack supports large-scale deployments and can efficiently scale resources up or down based on workload demands.
  • Ease of Management
    It offers a modern operational experience with a user-friendly interface, simplifying the management of cloud infrastructure.
  • Flexibility
    The platform provides flexibility in choosing infrastructure components and can run on various hardware, including commodity servers.
  • Community Support
    As part of the OpenStack community, it benefits from a vast pool of shared knowledge, resources, and collaborative support.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    Deploying and managing OpenStack with Kubernetes requires significant expertise and understanding of both technologies, demanding a steep learning curve.
  • Resources Intensive
    Running both OpenStack and Kubernetes can be resource-intensive, potentially leading to higher infrastructure costs.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Mirantis' ecosystem and tools may lead to vendor lock-in, making future migrations or integrations challenging.
  • Support Costs
    While community support is available, enterprise-grade support from Mirantis can be costly, impacting the total cost of ownership.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

GlusterFS 1 video + Add
Mirantis OpenStack 2 videos + Add

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Mirantis OpenStack 8.0: Tutorial and Demo

More videos

  • - Mirantis OpenStack: Fuel 8.0 New Features

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GlusterFS
Mirantis OpenStack
100% 100%
0% 0%
68% 68%
32% 32%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and Mirantis OpenStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GlusterFS 2 mentions
Mirantis OpenStack 0 mentions
  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking Mirantis OpenStack since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to GlusterFS and Mirantis OpenStack

When comparing GlusterFS and Mirantis OpenStack, you can also consider the following products.