Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Gitorious VS Ceph

Compare Gitorious VS Ceph and see what are their differences

Gitorious

Managed Server.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Ceph

Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
AxCrypt
AxCrypt is a powerful, easy-to-use encryption tool that protects your files, passwords, and personal information with strong AES-256 security. Available on Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS, it keeps your data safe wherever you go. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ceph seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 14
Git popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
55 vs 144

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Gitorious
Ceph
Website gitorious.org ceph.io
Listed in
Development Code Collaboration Git IDE +1
Storage Cloud Storage Object Storage Project Management +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Gitorious 3 features
Ceph 5 features
  • Open Source
    Gitorious is open source, allowing users to modify and improve the platform according to their needs.
  • Self-Hosting
    Gitorious can be hosted on a personal or private server, giving users full control over their repositories and data.
  • Collaboration Features
    The platform offers collaboration tools such as merge requests, issue tracking, and project wikis, which facilitate team development efforts.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Longer Maintained
    Gitorious was acquired by GitLab in 2015 and is no longer maintained, meaning it does not receive updates or support.
  • Limited Integration
    Compared to other platforms like GitHub or GitLab, Gitorious lacks integration with popular development tools and services.
  • User Interface
    The user interface is considered less modern and user-friendly compared to more current code hosting platforms.
  • Scalability
    Ceph is designed to scale horizontally by adding more nodes. This allows for seamless expansion of storage capacity as needs grow.
  • High Availability
    Ceph provides high availability and fault tolerance through its distributed architecture and data replication methods, ensuring data is always accessible.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Ceph has a large community of developers and users which help in rapid identification and rectification of issues. It also offers lower cost of ownership compared to proprietary solutions.
  • Versatility
    Ceph supports block storage, object storage, and file systems within the same cluster, providing great flexibility and reducing the need for multiple storage solutions.
  • Performance
    Ceph delivers high performance, particularly for large-scale deployments, by balancing loads and efficiently distributing data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a Ceph cluster can be complex and requires skilled administrators, which might not be suitable for smaller organizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    Ceph can be resource-heavy, demanding significant CPU, memory, and network resources, which can be a limitation for smaller setups.
  • Documentation
    Despite a rich set of features, Ceph’s documentation can sometimes be lacking or difficult for new users to comprehend, potentially leading to longer learning curves.
  • Hardware Requirements
    Ceph typically requires high-quality, enterprise-grade hardware to achieve optimal performance and reliability, which can entail a higher upfront investment.
  • Operational Overhead
    Day-to-day management, monitoring, and troubleshooting of Ceph clusters require a specialized skill set, leading to possible increases in operational overhead.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Gitorious 3 videos + Add
Ceph 3 videos + Add

Getting Started with Gitorious

More videos

  • - GitMinutes #04: Marius Mathiesen on Gitorious and Git Infrastructure
  • - pyclic lost on gitorious or git.sugarlabs?

UDS 2013-03: Ceph Review - Part 1/2

More videos

  • - Designing for High Performance Ceph at Scale
  • - RHCS 4 Cockpit Ceph Installer

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Gitorious
Ceph
100% 100%
Git
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100%
100% 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Storage
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Gitorious and Ceph. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Gitorious no reviews yet
Ceph no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Gitorious yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Gitorious 0 mentions
Ceph 14 mentions

Tracking Gitorious since Mar 2021.

  • `shutdown -h now` destroyed 13 of our 48 Ceph OSDs. Here is how we got the data back
    Ceph is distributed storage. You give it a pile of disks spread across a pile of machines, and it presents them as one system that speaks three protocols at once: block devices for VMs, a POSIX filesystem you can mount, and an S3... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.1 available
    > The Proxmox answer to this is Ceph - https://ceph.io/en/ And how does Ceph/RBD work over Fibre Channel SANs? - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.1 available
    The Proxmox answer to this is Ceph - https://ceph.io/en/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

View more

Alternatives to Gitorious and Ceph

When comparing Gitorious and Ceph, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...