GitHub Sponsors Reviews

TinyURL Reviews

GitHub Sponsors mentions (143)

• GitHub should charge everyone $1 more per month

  This... exists? Did they even search for it? https://github.com/open-source/sponsors. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Unveiling Open Software License 2.1: A Comprehensive Review and Future Outlook

  Community-Driven Upgrades: Increased integration of real-time community feedback via platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and social media channels (e.g., Twitter (@fsf)) could drive iterative improvements in the license. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Funding in Open Source: A Conversation with Chad Whitacre

  Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Exploring GitHub Sponsors: Global Impact and Future Funding Innovations

  Abstract: This post dives into the evolution and global expansion of GitHub Sponsors and its impact on funding open-source projects. We examine its inception, supported countries, technical challenges, and how blockchain innovations and alternative funding models are shaping the future of open source development. From core benefits and practical use cases to potential hurdles and forward-looking trends, this... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Sustainable Funding for Open Source: Navigating Challenges and Emerging Innovations

  This post explores the critical issue of sustainable funding for open source projects. We dive into historical challenges, innovative funding strategies, and future trends that aim to support the collaborative spirit of open source development. Using examples from corporate sponsorships, non-profit foundations, crowdfunding methods, subscription models, government grants, and commercialization, the article... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

TinyURL mentions (6)

• 🔐 Design a TinyURL System (Like Bit.ly) — From Scratch

  Import string Class TinyURL: def __init__(self): self.url_to_code = {} self.code_to_url = {} self.counter = 1 self.alphabet = string.ascii_letters + string.digits def encode_base62(self, num): base = 62 chars = [] while num > 0: num, rem = divmod(num, base) chars.append(self.alphabet[rem]) return... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• URL shorteners and why would you need one?

  Choose a shortener: Pick a link shortener that fits your needs---many offer options like custom branding, QR code creation, and analytics. Ziplink, Short.io, and Bitly are all capable of that. If you are looking for something really simple, you may want to check out TinyURL as well. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Building a Scalable URL Shortener with Node.js (Part 1/2)

  I'm sure you're familiar with URL shortener tools like TinyURL and Bitly, as they are widely used online. It simply takes a long URL and creates a shorter, unique alias that redirects to the original link. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• More "J3w World Order" disinfo spread online

  u/Migmag360 The reason your post cannot be posted and/or approved by us is because it contains a Bitchute link--which reddit bans. You have to mask the link using TinyURL. And then re-post it again with the new link instead. Source: over 3 years ago

• Does the Atomic Bomb exist? Part 2

  u/fedx0 I have approved this post, the reason it's still banned by Reddit is because of the Bitchute links, you cannot post Bitchute links on Reddit. If you remove the links to Bitchute, or disguise the Bitchute links using TinyUrl and re-post the article, then it should be fine. If not then you will have to post the article somewhere else, then post the link to it on here instead. Source: almost 4 years ago