GitHub Pages
Vercel
Netlify
Jekyll
Cloudflare Pages
surge.sh
Neocities
tiiny.host
Xnapper
Shottr
BrandBird
ScreenStudio
Supasnap
Tella
CleanShot X
Loom
Xnapper is a nataive macOS Application that enables users to take beautiful screenshots instantly, making it "social media ready" the moment you snap your screen.
GitHub Pages XnapperBased on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Xnapper. While we know about 504 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Xnapper. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The site itself is a statically generated Next.js app, built in CI and deployed to GitHub Pages via actions/deploy-pages. No server to manage, no hosting bill. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Static sites are fast and cheap to host, but your data goes stale the moment you deploy. This post shows how a SvelteKit portfolio site serves live data from five external sources while still deploying as static HTML to GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
All three themes are designed for accessible deployment. You can host them for free on Netlify, GitHub Pages, Vercel, or Cloudflare Pages. The only cost is a domain name (which can be as cheap as $5/year on Porkbun). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
This action can store collected benchmark results in GitHub pages branch and provide a chart view. Benchmark results are visualized on the GitHub pages of your project. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
But that's not the case. The blog is a simple static generated website using Jekyll, it is built and served through GitHub Pages. With that in mind it makes more sense to use tools and leverage tool calling. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
600 hours to build another screenshot editor? Which just adds some gradient and aligns the image? What are some differences between your product and the following free services? https://screenzy.io/ https://screenshot.rocks/ https://www.fabpic.app/ https://shoteasy.fun/screenshot-beautifier https://gemoo.com/screen-capture/ https://xnapper.com/ https://codeimage.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
No, it's taking a screenshot of the browser's content, then adding padding to the surrounding image, and letting you pick a colour for it. Screenshot Software like Cleanshot X and Xnapper have this feature built in, either as a default or as a customisable setting.They're basically making it unnecessary to use a third-party screenshot tool to achieve the same effect. Why would you want it? I have no clue.... Source: over 2 years ago
Reminds me of https://xnapper.com/, except for code. I imagine some people might tweet snippets of code, and this makes the snippet look much more visually appealing. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Xnapper can do this. https://xnapper.com/. Source: about 3 years ago
I built a screenshot app for macOS and made ~$3k/mo from it :) https://xnapper.com People like the app for its ability to turn a normal boring screenshot into a beautiful one that they can share on social media instantly. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Shottr - Shottr is a free macOS screenshot app with scrolling screenshots, OCR, annotation and measurement instruments.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
BrandBird - Brand your Twitter content uniquely
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
ScreenStudio - Streaming, made easy!