Software Alternatives & Reviews

GitHub Pages VS Firebase Hosting

Compare GitHub Pages VS Firebase Hosting and see what are their differences

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Firebase Hosting logo Firebase Hosting

Production-grade Hosting for Developers
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19
  • Firebase Hosting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

GitHub Pages videos

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

Firebase Hosting videos

Firebase Hosting Tutorial #1 - Intro & Installation

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Pages and Firebase Hosting)
Static Site Generators
Website Builder
84 84%
16% 16
Cloud Computing
95 95%
5% 5
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Pages and Firebase Hosting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Pages and Firebase Hosting

GitHub Pages Reviews

Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.

Firebase Hosting Reviews

We have no reviews of Firebase Hosting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Firebase Hosting. While we know about 466 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 23 mentions of Firebase Hosting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Pages mentions (466)

  • Yet Another Tour of an Open-Source Elm SPA
    For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • How to build your interactive resume in 4 simple and 2 easy steps
    It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform
    As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Free Static Web Hosting Services in 2024 ⚡️
    Ideal for open source projects, docs sites, and portfolios. GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

Firebase Hosting mentions (23)

  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building an entire fullstack project with Firebase 10 and React (Vite)
    Nowadays you can deploy your client side web apps almost anywhere for free, like Netlify, Vercel or Surge or even Firebase hosting. However as we’re using Firebase in this tutorial, let’s explore deploying with firebase as well. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ngrok account banned
    If you have a Google account you can host a single static web application with Firebase for free https://firebase.google.com/docs/hosting. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Google cloud CDN
    If you want to serve static content (like HTML, CSS, and JS files) and you can be flexible about where you deploy it, Firebase Hosting may be a good alternative for you. You deploy your files with a single command and they take care of putting on a global CDN for you. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Dose firebase hosting delete files generated by your node.js app?
    Well I thought they do? The introduction in documentation says "Firebase Hosting provides fast and secure hosting for your web app, static and dynamic content, and microservices.". Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Pages and Firebase Hosting, you can also consider the following products

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

surge.sh - Static website hosting for front-end developers.

Neocities - Create your own free website. Unlimited creativity, zero ads.