surge.sh VS Firebase Hosting

Surge.sh — a simple cloud platform for deploying static websites. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago

There's also surge.sh (https://surge.sh) but I'm not sure if they have similar policies as Netlify. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Surge: Static web publishing for front-end developers. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

Surge.sh — Static web publishing for Front-End developers. Unlimited sites with custom domain support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

"Deploy anything in six keystrokes" https://surge.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

Nowadays you can deploy your client side web apps almost anywhere for free, like Netlify, Vercel or Surge or even Firebase hosting. However as we’re using Firebase in this tutorial, let’s explore deploying with firebase as well. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

If you have a Google account you can host a single static web application with Firebase for free https://firebase.google.com/docs/hosting. Source: about 1 year ago

If you want to serve static content (like HTML, CSS, and JS files) and you can be flexible about where you deploy it, Firebase Hosting may be a good alternative for you. You deploy your files with a single command and they take care of putting on a global CDN for you. Source: about 1 year ago

Well I thought they do? The introduction in documentation says "Firebase Hosting provides fast and secure hosting for your web app, static and dynamic content, and microservices.". Source: about 1 year ago