Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GitHub Hovercard VS Apache Subversion

Compare GitHub Hovercard VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Tapzo
Business cards arenโ€™t dead. They just got stuck in the past. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

GitHub Hovercard logo GitHub Hovercard

GitHub Hovercard provides neat hovercards for GitHub.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • GitHub Hovercard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-12
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

GitHub Hovercard features and specs

  • User Convenience
    GitHub Hovercard provides quick access to user profile information, allowing users to preview details without navigating away from the current page.
  • Time Efficiency
    By displaying concise information on hover, it saves users time from opening multiple tabs to gather information about repositories or contributors.
  • Enhanced Workflow
    The tool integrates seamlessly with GitHub, enhancing the workflow by allowing users to gain insights quickly which can be particularly useful for contributors and project maintainers.
  • Ease of Use
    Installing and using GitHub Hovercard is straightforward, making it accessible for users of varying technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Hovercard

  • Limited Information
    While it provides useful information at a glance, GitHub Hovercard might not display comprehensive details which might require visiting the full profile or repository page.
  • Browser Compatibility
    The tool might not be fully compatible with all web browsers or might require specific settings to function properly, potentially limiting its utility for some users.
  • Performance Impact
    Loading hovercards in real-time could impact browser performance, particularly if multiple tabs or extensions are running simultaneously.
  • Privacy Concerns
    There could be privacy concerns related to accessing and displaying GitHub-related data through third-party tools, depending on how data is managed and stored.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVNโ€™s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

GitHub Hovercard videos

+ Add

GitHub Hovercard

More videos:

  • Review - GitHub Hovercard Extension

Apache Subversion videos

+ Add

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Hovercard and Apache Subversion)

GitHub Hovercard

Apache Subversion

Software Development
100 100%
Software Development
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Hovercard and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Hovercard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Hovercard mentions (1)

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Hovercard and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

GitZip - Download or create a download link for a GitHub project folder/sub-folder or file.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Enhanced GitHub - :rocket: Chrome extension to display size of each file, download link and copy file contents directly to clipboard - softvar/enhanced-github

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Loading...