
CodersRank
GitHub City
Contributions for GitHub
GitHub Metrics
GitMerch
GitHub Personal Website Generator
GitWrapped
All your GitHub contributions in one image

UI for Apache Kafka
Conduktor
Kafka Manager
KafkaHQ
Kpow by Factor House
Lenses.io
Kafma is a Kafka GUI client and desktop IDE. Debug Kafka fast. Replay production issues locally.
Which is more popular?
Kafma might be a bit more popular than GitHub Contributions. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to GitHub Contributions.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github-contributions.vercel.app | kafma.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of GitHub Contributions yet.
Kafma is a desktop IDE for Kafka built around one idea: a topic is a tab. Consume and produce in one workspace, inspect schemas and lag, and replay any message to another topic. Data Clone copies a production topic — its config, schemas, and a slice of real data masked by your rules — to a local...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitHub Contributions and Kafma.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma combines two Kafka debugging workflows in one desktop app. The Console keeps consuming, inspecting, producing, and replaying messages in one workspace. Data Clone copies a remote topic’s configuration, schemas, and a selected slice of data to a local cluster, with custom masking rules and without modifying the source.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is designed for hands-on Kafka debugging rather than dashboard-only monitoring. It brings messages, the producer, and topic details into one workspace, while Data Clone makes it easy to bring remote topic context to a local cluster for testing.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is built for backend developers, platform engineers, data engineers, and SREs who develop, test, or troubleshoot Kafka-based applications.
Kafma's answer:
Kafka debugging often spreads one investigation across terminals, browser tabs, and scratch files. Kafma was built to keep that workflow in one place and make it faster to bring remote Kafka data and schemas into a local test environment.
Share your experience with using GitHub Contributions and Kafma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Funnily enough, this tool isn't new but it's been there since 2018 and you can find it at https://github-contributions.vercel.app/. Source: almost 4 years ago
Kafkactl is the right tool for scripts, CI jobs, and quick checks. When an investigation means reading many records and moving between topics, schemas, and consumer groups, a Kafka GUI client such as Kafma connects to the same clusters,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
When comparing GitHub Contributions and Kafma, you can also consider the following products.

The Ultimate Profile For Developers | Turn Your Code Into Your Digital Developer Profile & Get Hired Faster
Compare CodersRank to GitHub Contributions or Kafma:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to GitHub Contributions or Kafma:

GitHub Ctiy uses ThreeJS to create a 3D city from your GitHub contributions.
Compare GitHub City to GitHub Contributions or Kafma:

Collaborative Kafka Development Platform
Compare Conduktor to GitHub Contributions or Kafma:

Show your GitHub contributions graph on your iOS Devices
Compare Contributions for GitHub to GitHub Contributions or Kafma:

A tool for managing Apache Kafka.
Compare Kafka Manager to GitHub Contributions or Kafma: