
GitWrapped
JANDI
GitHub Contributions
GitHub Metrics
Superpowered
GitHub Personal Website Generator
GitHub
Show your GitHub contributions graph on your iOS Devices

UI for Apache Kafka
Conduktor
Kafka Manager
KafkaHQ
Kpow by Factor House
Lenses.io
Kafma is a Kafka GUI client and desktop IDE. Debug Kafka fast. Replay production issues locally.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Kafma seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | kafma.app |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Contributions for GitHub yet.
Kafma is a desktop IDE for Kafka built around one idea: a topic is a tab. Consume and produce in one workspace, inspect schemas and lag, and replay any message to another topic. Data Clone copies a production topic — its config, schemas, and a slice of real data masked by your rules — to a local...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Contributions for GitHub and Kafma.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma combines two Kafka debugging workflows in one desktop app. The Console keeps consuming, inspecting, producing, and replaying messages in one workspace. Data Clone copies a remote topic’s configuration, schemas, and a selected slice of data to a local cluster, with custom masking rules and without modifying the source.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is designed for hands-on Kafka debugging rather than dashboard-only monitoring. It brings messages, the producer, and topic details into one workspace, while Data Clone makes it easy to bring remote topic context to a local cluster for testing.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is built for backend developers, platform engineers, data engineers, and SREs who develop, test, or troubleshoot Kafka-based applications.
Kafma's answer:
Kafka debugging often spreads one investigation across terminals, browser tabs, and scratch files. Kafma was built to keep that workflow in one place and make it faster to bring remote Kafka data and schemas into a local test environment.
Share your experience with using Contributions for GitHub and Kafma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Contributions for GitHub since Mar 2021.
Kafkactl is the right tool for scripts, CI jobs, and quick checks. When an investigation means reading many records and moving between topics, schemas, and consumer groups, a Kafka GUI client such as Kafma connects to the same clusters,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
When comparing Contributions for GitHub and Kafma, you can also consider the following products.

View/Share how you contributed to Github over the years
Compare GitWrapped to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma:

JANDI is a group-oriented messaging platform with an integrated suite of collaboration tools that is tailor-made for workplaces in Asia.
Compare JANDI to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma:

Collaborative Kafka Development Platform
Compare Conduktor to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma:

All your GitHub contributions in one image
Compare GitHub Contributions to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma:

A tool for managing Apache Kafka.
Compare Kafka Manager to Contributions for GitHub or Kafma: