
GitBook
Mintlify
Docusaurus
ReadMe
Archbee.io
Confluence
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
websocketd
soketi
Hook Relay
Pusher
Crow
LNAV
Discord
Zapier
GitBook
websocketdNo websocketd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, GitBook should be more popular than websocketd. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes thatโs exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. Youโll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, itโs a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook โ a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: over 3 years ago
Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: almost 5 years ago
Mintlify - The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.
Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.