Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

soketi VS websocketd

Compare soketi VS websocketd and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

soketi logo soketi

Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.
  • soketi Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27

soketi features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to soketi and websocketd)

soketi

websocketd

Developer Tools
43 43%
Developer Tools
57% 57
APIs
44 44%
APIs
56% 56
Internet Of Things
56 56%
Internet Of Things
44% 44
GitHub
100 100%
GitHub
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using soketi and websocketd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, websocketd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

soketi mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of soketi yet. Tracking of soketi recommendations started around Jan 2022.

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing soketi and websocketd, you can also consider the following products

Cleora - Native HTTP & WebSocket Client for iOS, iPadOS & macOS

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.

Laravel WebSockets - Laravel WebSockets is a package for Laravel and up that will get your application started with...

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

Loading...