GitBook
Mintlify
Docusaurus
ReadMe
Archbee.io
Confluence
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
Bandwidth
Twilio
Plivo
Nexmo
Network Lights
FreeMeter
MessageBird
VoIP.ms
GitBook BandwidthBased on our record, Bandwidth seems to be a lot more popular than GitBook. While we know about 73 links to Bandwidth, we've tracked only 6 mentions of GitBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes thatโs exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. Youโll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, itโs a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook โ a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
I know this was a scam, but I spooked them (or broke the bot?) before I heard their plan. I did a reverse image search, and I found nothing. I looked at the metadata on the image, but I saw nothing useful. I looked up the number and found out it was a virtual number from bandwidth.com. I didn't know what to do after that, so I just reported the number to bandwidth. Source: over 2 years ago
I wanted to add a secondary provider though with Direct Routing for fail over but was looking for recommendations. I'm in Canada so prefer someone with a Canadian POP but not mandatory. I also prefer self-signup when possible, similar to Telnyx, Flowroute etc. I was checking bandwidth.com as I see they do this but it doesn't let you sign up and wants you to contact sales. That's fine and I was planning on... Source: over 3 years ago
You can pop your area code and prefix in the link below and see what providers do have a presence. Obviously, Sprint/T-Mobile will be one of them but if you don't see bandwidth.com then you're out of luck and there are no workarounds. Source: over 3 years ago
Your provider should be able to provide a short code (e.g. '933' if using bandwidth.com) that will read out the e911 information for the number calling. Source: over 3 years ago
While I think you have your answer, another way to validate a number is to use https://freecarrierlookup.com/ and check the phone number. From that you can often tell if it is a "web only" number that a scammer outside the US would use. For example, it might belong to bandwidth.com or google voice. If it does belong to Bandwidth.com you can report it to them, and they are really fast at cancelling scammers. Source: over 3 years ago
Mintlify - The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
Twilio - Brings voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
Plivo - Plivo simplifies your customer engagement.
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.
Nexmo - Nexmo is a simple two way SMS API with global reach and wholesale rates