
Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

LeadTruffle
AIRA
Pitch It
Leadmend
Lead Rescue
LeadSpheres
Tack Tools Pro
AI lead response for home-service businesses: capture and respond to new customers from phone calls, website forms, and missed calls, with follow-up that continues if they don't book. Not a CRM -- works alongside what you use.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | seenonmain.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of git-sizer yet.
SeenOnMain is an AI-powered lead-response platform built for local home-service businesses -- plumbers, electricians, HVAC companies, house cleaning services, landscaping and lawn care, roofing companies, and general contractors. The moment a lead calls a dedicated number or submits a website...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of SeenOnMain yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
SeenOnMain Features
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing git-sizer and SeenOnMain.
SeenOnMain's answer:
SeenOnMain never puts an AI on the phone with your customer. The moment a lead submits your website's form or calls your dedicated number, the AI detects it and gets a real human -- you -- on the phone or texting back within seconds, so you're the one actually talking to and closing every lead. Most AI tools in this space do the opposite: they put their own AI voice agent on the call. SeenOnMain also includes a lead-capture page (embedded in your existing site, or a hosted mini-website if you don't have one), AI-personalized follow-up for two weeks if a lead doesn't book, and it's fully managed by a real team -- no software to configure yourself.
SeenOnMain's answer:
Two reasons buyers keep citing: who talks to the customer, and how easy it is to actually try. SeenOnMain keeps a real human closing every lead instead of an AI voice agent qualifying callers on its own. And where most named competitors in this space gate pricing behind a demo call, SeenOnMain publishes its pricing ($49-$99/month) and starts with a genuine self-serve 14-day free trial, no card and no demo required. It also works alongside Jobber, Housecall Pro, and ServiceTitan rather than replacing them.
SeenOnMain's answer:
Solo operators and small crews in local home-service trades -- plumbers, electricians, HVAC companies, house cleaning services, landscaping and lawn care businesses, roofing companies, and general contractors -- whose leads come in through phone calls, website forms, and missed calls, and who don't have the time or a dedicated front-desk person to respond to every one instantly.
SeenOnMain's answer:
Founder David Cavill built SeenOnMain on the belief that AI-assisted automation shouldn't be priced or built like an enterprise tool -- a lead form, a quote flow, and instant follow-up shouldn't cost $10,000+ upfront and a retainer, and a small business owner shouldn't need to understand AI to get it. He personally sets up and manages every account. Before SeenOnMain, he spent 15+ years leading technology and operations work (documented $9M+ in revenue impact and $1.75M+ in cost savings), and holds a PMP and an MBA.
SeenOnMain's answer:
React (Vite + React Router) on the frontend, a Node.js backend on PostgreSQL (Neon), Twilio for calls/SMS, and Anthropic's Claude for AI-assisted personalization and classification (lead-intent detection, AI-written follow-ups and proposals).
Share your experience with using git-sizer and SeenOnMain. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking SeenOnMain since Sep 2026.