
Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Artefact
Uselink
Publish and share AI-generated HTML artifacts in seconds.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | havetml.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of git-sizer yet.
HaveTML is infrastructure for AI-generated artifacts. Upload HTML/MD/YAML/JSON, get a permanent sandboxed share link, then review with pinned comments, versions, projects, and access controls.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of HaveTML yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing git-sizer and HaveTML.
HaveTML's answer:
HaveTML is infrastructure for AI-generated artifacts. Upload HTML/MD/YAML/JSON, get a permanent sandboxed share link, then review with pinned comments, versions, projects, and access controls.
Share your experience with using git-sizer and HaveTML. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking HaveTML since Jul 2026.