
twitterapi.io
SocialData Tools
TweetAPI
Sorsa API
Twexapi
TwitterAPIs
XFlux
GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API and X API. $0.001 per call returns ~20 tweets ($0.05 per 1,000). Fetch tweets, profiles, followers. Cheapest Twitter & X API alternative.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Squoosh seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 203 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | getxapi.com | squoosh.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API (X API) for developers and AI agents: pay-per-call data with no subscription and no X developer account. Most endpoints are $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets); DMs are $0.002. New accounts get $0.10 in free credits, no card. Read: search, profiles,...
No description of Squoosh yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Web developers, designers, bloggers, and anyone needing to optimize images for the web, particularly those concerned about maintaining image quality while reducing file size.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No GetXAPI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Jumbo Squoosh-o’s Review! #SLIMESTAGRAM #JumboSquooshos
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GetXAPI and Squoosh.
GetXAPI's answer
Developers and AI-agent builders who need affordable, reliable Twitter/X data without the cost or setup of the official API. Typical users are indie developers and founders, automation builders (n8n, MCP, Cursor), growth and social-monitoring teams, and researchers collecting tweet datasets.
GetXAPI's answer
GetXAPI is the cheapest way to read and write Twitter/X data programmatically. Most endpoints cost $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets) on a pure pay-per-call model, with no subscription, no developer-account approval, and no platform-level rate limits. You sign up with email, copy a Bearer token, and start calling 50+ endpoints right away.
GetXAPI's answer
It is roughly 3x cheaper than twitterapi.io and far cheaper than the official X API for reads, with no monthly minimum, so you only pay for what you use. Unlike the official API there is no developer-account approval and no 15-minute rate-limit windows to engineer around. It also ships ready-made integrations: a public OpenAPI 3.1 spec, an MCP server for Claude and Cursor, and Apify actors.
GetXAPI's answer
GetXAPI started after its founder kept overpaying for Twitter/X data through the official API, Apify, and RapidAPI. After spending weeks understanding how those tools work, he built a leaner pay-per-call API that delivers the same reads and writes at a fraction of the cost, with no subscription or developer account. It launched publicly in early 2026 and grew through the developer community.
GetXAPI's answer
GetXAPI is a REST API built on Node.js and TypeScript, returning JSON with Bearer-token authentication and a public OpenAPI 3.1 specification. For integration it provides an MCP server (Claude, Cursor, Continue), Apify actors, a Postman collection, and interactive Fern docs.
GetXAPI's answer
Share your experience with using GetXAPI and Squoosh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


There is no single threshold across all packages. TweetAPI PAYG costs $0.50 per 1,000 normal units; GetXAPI's undiscounted standard calls cost $1 per 1,000. But GetXAPI Pro includes 30,000 base standard calls for $15,...
The only negative thing about this web app, is that it's not clear which formats are supported in which browsers.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking GetXAPI since Jun 2026.
Use Squoosh for an interactive local comparison, your CMS's image pipeline, or a hosted tool such as TinyImage. Choose the processing model that fits the image and your workflow. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
WebP/AVIF over PNG/JPG: Converted all icons to WebP (using Squoosh) – average size reduction of ~60% (e.g., a 40KB PNG icon became 15KB WebP). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
It often comes down to compat, and developer requests. Personally I find in-browser encoding for images inadequate, because it doesn't expose enough options. When we built https://squoosh.app/, we exposed the browser encoders for... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
When comparing GetXAPI and Squoosh, you can also consider the following products.

Reliable Twitter API Alternative | Access Twitter data at scale without limits. Our enterprise-grade API offers unlimited data access, better pricing, and higher rate limits than Twitter's official API. Perfect for businesses needing mass data.
Compare twitterapi.io to GetXAPI or Squoosh:

Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!
Compare TinyPNG to GetXAPI or Squoosh:

Twitter/X data API without the enterprise price
Compare SocialData Tools to GetXAPI or Squoosh:

iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.
Compare iLoveIMG to GetXAPI or Squoosh:

Twitter data API for developers and researchers: 82 endpoints, pay as you go from $5, SDKs, MCP, 100 free requests.
Compare TweetAPI to GetXAPI or Squoosh:

convert anything to anything - more than 200 different audio, video, document, ebook, archive, image, spreadsheet and presentation formats supported.
Compare CloudConvert to GetXAPI or Squoosh: