GetCertifyHere VS git-sizer

• Comprehensive Study Materials
  GetCertifyHere provides a wide range of study materials, including practice tests, study guides, and question banks, which can help users prepare effectively for certification exams.
• Regular Updates
  The platform regularly updates its content to reflect the latest exam objectives and formats, ensuring that users study with the most current information.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The website is designed to be user-friendly, making it easier for users to navigate through available resources and find the materials they need efficiently.
• Money-Back Guarantee
  GetCertifyHere often offers a money-back guarantee to users who are not satisfied with their exam results after using their materials, providing a level of security and trust.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Some users may find the cost of the preparation materials to be on the higher side compared to other resources available online.
• Limited Free Resources
  The platform may offer limited free resources, thereby requiring users to purchase materials to access the most comprehensive practice exams and study guides.
• Variable Quality
  While many users find the materials helpful, some feedback suggests that the quality of content can vary, necessitating additional resources for comprehensive preparation.
• Feedback Mechanism
  The response to user feedback and queries regarding the resources or technical issues might not be as prompt or effective as expected.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Tracking GetCertifyHere since Dec 2021.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago