Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

fx VS Profiley

Compare fx VS Profiley and see what are their differences

fx

Command-line JSON processing tool

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Profiley

Open every link in the right browser profile. Free for Mac.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Eddyter
Build and integrate a WYSIWYG editor in minutes. Eddyter offers fast setup, developer-friendly APIs, and seamless content editing for modern web apps today. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, fx seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 21 times since March 2021.

social mentions
21 vs 0
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
62 vs 11

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

fx
Profiley
Website github.com profiley.topc.social
Pricing
Open source
Open source Free
Company — Startup from India · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in
Developer Tools JSON Development Productivity +1
Web Browsers Productivity Mac Open Source +1

About fx and Profiley

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

fx
Profiley

No description of fx yet.

Profiley opens links from Slack, WhatsApp, Mail and other apps in the right browser profile instead of whichever window was last in front. The first time it sees a site it asks which profile to use, then remembers, so there are no rules to write. Hold Option to choose again. It finds your...

Read more about Profiley

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

fx 5 features
Profiley 0 features
  • Interactive JSON Viewer
    fx provides an interactive command-line JSON viewer that allows users to explore and manipulate JSON data intuitively.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    The tool is compact and easy to use, making it an excellent choice for users who need quick data examination without complex setup.
  • Scriptable
    Users can use JavaScript expressions to filter and transform JSON data, offering flexibility in data manipulation.
  • Integration
    fx can be easily integrated into shell scripts and other command-line tools due to its standard input/output operations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Being a Node.js-based tool, fx is cross-platform and can run on multiple operating systems supporting Node.js.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    fx is designed primarily for viewing and transforming JSON, so it may not have advanced features found in full-fledged data processing tools.
  • JavaScript Requirement
    Users need to be familiar with JavaScript to effectively use fx's data transformation features, which might be a barrier for non-programmers.
  • Command-Line Only
    As a command-line tool, fx lacks a graphical user interface, which might be less appealing for users who prefer visual data interaction.
  • Performance
    Handling very large JSON files may lead to performance issues, as fx is primarily built for lightweight quick tasks.

No features have been listed yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

fx 3 videos + Add
Profiley 0 videos + Add

Suzuki FX | Suzuki Alto First Generation: Owner Review: Price, Specs & Features | PakWheels

More videos

  • - Numark Mixtrack Pro FX & Platinum FX Review - The best new DJ controllers for beginners?
  • - The PC-FX - Review - Game Sack

No Profiley videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
fx
Profiley
100% 100%
File Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mac
100% 100%
100% 100%
File Explorer
0% 0%
77% 77%
Productivity
23% 23%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing fx and Profiley.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Profiley's answer:

Swift, native macOS.

What makes your product unique?

Profiley's answer:

It works per profile, not just per browser. The first time you open a link from a site, it asks which profile to use and remembers. No rules or config files to write.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Profiley's answer:

Finicky needs you to write a JavaScript config. Velja, Choosy and OpenIn are paid. Profiley is free, open source, and learns your choices as you click instead of making you set them up first.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Profiley's answer:

People on a Mac who keep several browser profiles: work and personal, or one per client. Anyone tired of a Slack or WhatsApp link opening in the wrong profile and hitting "You need access".

What's the story behind your product?

Profiley's answer:

I use Comet with three profiles: personal, work and a client. Every link from Slack or WhatsApp opened in whichever one was in front, so I kept copying links between windows. I built a picker on top of Finicky for myself, then rewrote it as a native Mac app so nobody needs Finicky.

User comments

Share your experience with using fx and Profiley. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

fx 21 mentions
Profiley 0 mentions

View more

Tracking Profiley since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to fx and Profiley

When comparing fx and Profiley, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...