Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

fx VS fish shell

Compare fx VS fish shell and see what are their differences

fx logo fx

Command-line JSON processing tool

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.
  • fx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23

fx videos

Suzuki FX | Suzuki Alto First Generation: Owner Review: Price, Specs & Features | PakWheels

More videos:

  • Review - Numark Mixtrack Pro FX & Platinum FX Review - The best new DJ controllers for beginners?
  • Review - The PC-FX - Review - Game Sack

fish shell videos

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fx and fish shell)
File Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
100% 100
File Explorer
100 100%
0% 0
Blockchain
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fx and fish shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell should be more popular than fx. It has been mentiond 124 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fx mentions (17)

  • I wrote JOSN, a command-line JSON browser
    Neat! You mentioned not getting the hang of jq, have you played with fx? Source: about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Llama – Terminal File Manager
    This looks like something I'd use often. Thanks for creating it! For anyone who's not familiar, Anton is also behind the highly useful fx[0] for wrangling JSON data in the terminal. [0] https://github.com/antonmedv/fx. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • I'm developing a new command line tool for querying and transforming JSON files , called ~Q (pronounced "unquery"). My design goal is to create a tool that is powerful yet easy to use (aim to be more intuitive for users than existing tools such as jq). Let me know your thoughts and suggestions.
    I've been so fed up with jq's annoying syntax that I began thinking about developing something that can perform json operations in familiar syntax such as javascript but I ran into fx (https://github.com/antonmedv/fx) and it's been pretty great actually. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Fx 24.0.0
    Hi I’m the author of https://github.com/antonmedv/fx (terminal JSON viewer) Recently I decided to rewrite entire program to Go. And usually on second rewrite things end-up better. Main reason for this, I believe is clear end result, the target. I think new ersion of fx is much more superior:) I recommend you, to check it out ;) Would like to have some feedback and ideas for improvement. One of new cool features... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Zq: An Easier (and Faster) Alternative to Jq
    I really like fx (https://github.com/antonmedv/fx) for interactive stuff. It does exactly what I think you want. You can expand individual fields and explore the schema. However, I really do like jq for queries and scripting, so I keep both around. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

fish shell mentions (124)

  • Day 5 - More or less...
    We're using bash as our terminal shell for now (it is standard in many distros) but it is not the only one out there. If you want to test out zsh, fish or oh-my-zsh, you will see that there are a few differences and the features are usually the main differentiator. Try that, poke around. Source: 6 months ago
  • Devuan Upgrade: 4 to 5 Daedalus
    Before actual update, confirm your shell is independent on python. It is important when you use fish:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • fish-shell: the user-friendly command-line shell
    > As for why I don't think that's their goal, just look at https://fishshell.com/ not one of the listed features requires them to drop POSIX compatibility entirely. “Sensible scripting” is right there. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Antonmedv/walk: Terminal file manager
    This is the default behaviour of fish[1], by the way! [1]: https://fishshell.com. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Is there any way to make fonts "thicker"?
    Last suggestion? Give fish a go. Its amazing. https://fishshell.com/. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fx and fish shell, you can also consider the following products

jello - jello is a command line tool that filters JSON data using pure python syntax.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

jq - jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured...

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Emuto - Emuto is a small language for manipulating and restructuring JSON and other data files.

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.