Fullstack Vue VS Record3D

• Comprehensive Coverage
  Fullstack Vue offers a comprehensive guide to understanding the Vue.js framework, covering fundamental topics as well as advanced applications.
• Practical Examples
  The resource provides practical, real-world examples and projects that help reinforce key concepts and provide context to Vue applications.
• Step-by-Step Approach
  The book follows a step-by-step approach, which is beneficial for learners by breaking down complex topics into manageable pieces.
• Access to Updated Content
  Fullstack Vue provides access to updated content through their platform, ensuring that readers have the most current information on Vue.js developments.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  Unlike some free resources available online, Fullstack Vue is a paid resource, which might be a barrier for some learners.
• Focus on Vue.js
  The resource, being specific to Vue.js, may not cover other complementary technologies in depth, potentially limiting its use for a broader tech stack understanding.
• Complexity for Beginners
  While thorough, the detailed content may be overwhelming for complete beginners who are not familiar with JavaScript or Frontend frameworks.
• Availability of Support
  Direct support options might be limited compared to community-backed platforms, reducing the opportunity for learners to get immediate assistance on queries.

• 3D Scanning Capability
  Record3D allows users to capture 3D models using the iPhone's LiDAR sensor, providing a relatively accessible way to create detailed 3D scans.
• Easy Sharing
  Users can easily share their 3D recordings with others through a variety of formats, making it convenient for collaboration and showcasing work.
• Real-time Depth Viewing
  The app provides real-time depth information, allowing users to see the 3D layout as they record, which enhances the scanning experience.
• User-Friendly Interface
  Record3D offers a clean and user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of recording and managing 3D content.

Possible disadvantages

• Device Limitations
  The app requires specific hardware, such as iPhones with LiDAR sensors, restricting its usability to users with compatible devices.
• Processing Time
  Rendering and processing 3D models can take a significant amount of time, which might be inconvenient for users needing quick results.
• Quality Variability
  The quality of 3D scans can vary depending on the lighting conditions and complexity of the objects, which may not meet professional-grade expectations.
• File Size
  3D recordings can result in large file sizes, potentially creating storage issues for users with limited space on their devices.

Tracking Fullstack Vue since Mar 2021.

• [R] CLIP-Fields: Weakly Supervised Semantic Fields for Robotic Memory + Code + Robot demo

  Best part, I believe, is that you should be able to train your own CLIP-Field for your living room if you have an hour, a decent GPU, and a way to get RGB-D video (an iPhone 13 Pro works great!) I hope you can give the code a try:... Source: almost 4 years ago

• An End-to-End Guide to Photogrammetry with Mobile Devices

  If you don't need publication-quality 3D models, the latest iPhones have built-in LIDAR sensors, both front (for facial recognition) and back (for AR). There are a variety of apps that can use these built-in sensors to build 3D models of... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago

• Show HN: Object Detection in an Hour

  Maybe worth to support front camera (TrueDepth camera) as well? Record3d gives pretty good accuracy (https://record3d.app/). I know probably not the best way to scan something without seeing the screen but better that than nothing. As a... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago