Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

frp VS socketify.py

Compare frp VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

frp logo frp

A fast reverse proxy to help you expose a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • frp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

frp features and specs

  • Versatile Tunneling
    FRP supports a variety of tunneling protocols, including HTTP, TCP, and UDP, making it suitable for a wide range of applications and use cases.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    FRP is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility in deployment across different environments.
  • Configuration Simplicity
    The tool's configuration is straightforward, enabling quick setup and deployment, especially for users with basic networking knowledge.
  • High Performance
    FRP is designed to handle high-performance tunneling, with efficient resource usage, ensuring reliable connectivity even under load.
  • Active Community
    FRP has an active open-source community that provides extensions, support, and frequent updates, contributing to its development and reliability.

Possible disadvantages of frp

  • Complexity in Advanced Configurations
    While basic setup is simple, more advanced configurations and customizations can become complex and may require deeper networking knowledge.
  • Security Considerations
    As with any tunneling software, running FRP without proper security measures can expose sensitive data to potential risks, requiring careful configuration and firewall rules.
  • Lack of Official Support
    Being an open-source project, FRP does not have formal customer support, which can be challenging for organizations that require guaranteed assistance.
  • Resource Consumption
    Though efficient, FRP still consumes additional resources, which may be a concern for environments with limited computational capacity.
  • Network Restrictions
    FRP may face restrictions in environments with strict network policies, such as corporate or government networks, impacting its accessibility and usability.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

frp videos

+ Add

DO NOT BUY - Roland FRP-1 Digital Piano Bundle With Bluetooth

More videos:

  • Review - Piano teacher tests and reviews a Roland FRP-1 digital piano bundle (Costco Exclusive)
  • Review - RIDER REVIEW! FRP Pocket Rocket from Amazon!

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to frp and socketify.py)

frp

socketify.py

Tunnel
100 100%
Tunnel
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100
Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
Websocket
0 0%
Websocket
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using frp and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare frp and socketify.py

frp Reviews

7 Ngrok Alternatives & Competitors for App Tunneling, Free & Paid
frp is a self-hosted reverse proxy server and client you can install from a simple binary executable compiled from Go, making it fast to load and run.
Source: onboardbase.com

socketify.py Reviews

We have no reviews of socketify.py yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, frp seems to be a lot more popular than socketify.py. While we know about 21 links to frp, we've tracked only 2 mentions of socketify.py. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

frp mentions (21)

  • Ask HN: Share Your Eccentric Hobby
    Some time ago I looked at running this on a very small cloud VM to act as a proxy for pi-based devices: https://github.com/fatedier/frp. - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • How to Put a Local Service on the Public Internet with FRP (Without Losing Your Mind Over Config Files)
    FRP (Fast Reverse Proxy) is an open-source tool by fatedier that exposes a local service behind a NAT or firewall to the public internet. It's battle-tested, written in Go, and has been the go-to answer in self-hosting communities for years. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Best Ngrok Alternatives in 2025
    Frp is an advanced, feature-rich reverse proxy that supports a variety of protocols and can be self-hosted. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Show HN: Pangolin โ€“ OSS tunneled reverse proxy (self-hosted Cloudflare Tunnels)
    How does it compare to frp, one of the most popular Open Source Cloudflare Tunnel alternative? https://github.com/fatedier/frp. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Expose home server with Rathole tunnel and Traefik
    In the previous article, I wrote about a temporary SSH tunneling technique to bypass CGNAT. This method is not suitable for exposing permanent services, at least not without autossh manager. Proper tools for this are rapiz1/rathole or fatedier/frp. I chose Rathole since it's written in Rust and offers better performance and benchmarks. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing frp and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Pinggy.io - Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary

Rathole - A reverse proxy for NAT traversal written in Rust. An alternative to frp and ngrok.

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

Packetriot - Serve Apps, Connect Software, Access Devices.

zrok - Next-generation sharing platform built on top of OpenZiti

Loading...