Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Packetriot VS socketify.py

Compare Packetriot VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Packetriot logo Packetriot

Serve Apps, Connect Software, Access Devices.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Packetriot Home Page
    Home Page //
    2024-05-16
  • Packetriot Tunnel Summary Page
    Tunnel Summary Page //
    2024-05-16
  • Packetriot Custom Domain Setup Page
    Custom Domain Setup Page //
    2024-05-16
  • Packetriot Subdomain Reservation Page
    Subdomain Reservation Page //
    2024-05-16

Host web and TCP applications on the Internet from any network or device. Access databases, custom web apps, SSH, media servers and more. Connect to IP video cameras, automation sensors, point of sale systems, a Raspberry Pi, or other devices without a VPN or managing firewalls. Alternative to ngrok.

  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Packetriot

$ Details
freemium $5.0 / Monthly (5 Tunnels, 5 TCP Ports / Tunnels, 1TB of Bandwidth)
Platforms
Windows Linux Mac OSX Cross Platform OpenBSD Docker FreeBSD
Release Date
2019 February
Startup details
Country
United States

socketify.py

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Packetriot features and specs

  • HTTP(s) Tunnels
    Secure TLS tunnels that reverse proxy traffic from our network to your applications running locally.
  • Custom Domains
    Packetriot allows users to set up tunnels with custom domains, providing a personalized and professional touch to their services.
  • IP Filtering
    Block or allow IP addresses to limit access to your applications.
  • Authentication
    The Packetriot client supports Open ID Connect, password portals and 2FA.
  • Security
    HTTPS on by default. TLS reverse tunnels secure all traffic between client and edge server. Docker Scout A+ rating.
  • Ease of Use
    Packetriot provides a web UI for managing tunnels, comprehensive documentation, tutorials and containers for simple install.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    The service supports various platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and even Raspberry Pi, making it versatile and accessible to a wide range of users.
  • Automatic Certificate Management
    Packetriot manages SSL certificates automatically, simplifying the process and enhancing security.
  • Floating Domain Names
    Packetriot provides reserved subdomains that can be dynamically assigned to tunnels and make it simple to maintain persistent endpoints beyond hostnames assigned to tunnels.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of Packetriot

Overall verdict

  • Packetriot is generally considered a good solution for individuals and businesses looking to simplify the process of securely exposing local services to the internet. Its reliability, simplicity, and feature set make it a suitable choice for many users.

Why this product is good

  • Packetriot is known for its user-friendly approach to creating secure tunnels to local servers from public endpoints. It is particularly appreciated for its ease of use, comprehensive features, and the ability to support various networking protocols. The platform allows developers and businesses to expose local servers to the internet securely, making it useful for testing, webhooks, and remote access solutions.

Recommended for

    Packetriot is recommended for developers, small businesses, and IT professionals who need to test applications remotely, provide access to local development environments, or create secure tunnels for data transmission. It's also suitable for anyone looking for an easy-to-use alternative to traditional VPNs for exposing services online.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Packetriot videos

Turn Your PC into Your New Home Server: Host Websites with XAMPP on the Internet! - Using Packetriot

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Setup and host Minecraft Server | Packetriot | No port forwarding | Easy tutorial
  • Tutorial - Packetriot Port Opening and Usage 2023
  • Tutorial - Access localhost HTTP/TCP Services from Internet using Packetriot [Hindi]
  • Tutorial - How to host a website from your own computer! (no hosting services)
  • Review - Introduction to packetriot
  • Review - Expose Gitea to Internet from a private network using Packetriot

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packetriot and socketify.py)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Python
0 0%
100% 100
Tunnel
100 100%
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Packetriot and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Packetriot and socketify.py

Packetriot Reviews

Localtonet | Best Ngrok Alternatives
Packetriot is another ngrok alternative that enables users to securely expose local web services and applications to the internet. It offers features such as custom domains, SSL/TLS encryption, and support for HTTP/2. Packetriot supports various platforms like Windows, macOS, Linux, and ARM-based devices like Raspberry Pi
Source: localtonet.com
7 Ngrok Alternatives & Competitors for App Tunneling, Free & Paid
Opt for Packetriot if you prefer paying per tunnel rather than per user (cheaper for large teams).
Source: onboardbase.com

socketify.py Reviews

We have no reviews of socketify.py yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packetriot should be more popular than socketify.py. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packetriot mentions (11)

  • Ask HN: Those making $500/month on side projects in 2025 โ€“ Show and tell
    I run Packetriot: https://packetriot.com, which is an alternative to ngrok. It's been in operation for 6-ish years and reached $500/month in year two. It doesn't replace my salary (yet) but that's what I'm working toward. Thankful to have thousands of users and some big companies using our services or self-hosting our server. This is a fun space to work in but there's lot of small competitors and opensource... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.
    Packetriot - Comprehensive alternative to ngrok. HTTP Inspector, Let's Encrypt integration, doesn't require root and Linux repos for apt, yum and dnf. Enterprise licenses and self-hosted option. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
    I built a similar service as well called Packetriot: https://packetriot.com Building these types of tunneling systems are great projects. You learn a lot and can master skills in many different areas. Packetriot has been operating for five years and the first few years was all spent on performance and stability of the core networking services. As the software and network matured, I spent more time on the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • glad to see IRC is still alive and kicking... but downloading files via xdcc pops up the prompt to accept the file, which automatically sends the file, but it is unable to connect to the irc user (connection timed out) (my firewall is off)
    Some forums suggest this as an alternative. Looks like there's a free tier to play with. This may be much simpler than running your own VPS (although learning how to do this gives you a hell of a lot of power in terms of doing other things you might want to do). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Open port on KVD21 for Disk Station?
    I use https://packetriot.com/ to set up tunnels to the ports I want to be opened. Pretty cheap and doesn't require a full-fledged VPN. You do however need to have a client program running. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packetriot and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

LocaltoNet - Expose localhost to the internet with a public URL

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

Webhook Relay - Webhook Relay receives, transforms and delivers webhooks to any destination โ€” a public URL, a private server, or your localhost. With durable retries your events survive outages, deploys and flaky endpoints, so nothing slips through.