Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Found.dev VS arXiv

Compare Found.dev VS arXiv and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Found.dev logo Found.dev

Find the best developers and jobs worldwide.

arXiv logo arXiv

arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.
  • Found.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-17
  • arXiv Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Found.dev features and specs

  • Streamlined Startup Process
    Found.dev offers tools and resources that simplify the process of starting a business, enabling entrepreneurs to focus on growth and development rather than administrative tasks.
  • Comprehensive Support
    The platform provides a wide range of services, from legal assistance to business planning, making it a one-stop-shop for startups seeking support in various areas.
  • Cost Efficiency
    By bundling necessary startup services into a single platform, Found.dev can reduce costs compared to hiring individual consultants or service providers.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with ease of use in mind, making it accessible to entrepreneurs without extensive business or technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Found.dev

  • Limited Customization
    The standardized offerings may not fit the unique needs of every business, particularly those requiring highly customized solutions.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Relying heavily on Found.dev for critical business functions can be risky if the platform experiences downtime or if the company changes its service offerings.
  • Potential Overhead
    While the platform is designed to streamline processes, there may be a learning curve or additional overhead in adapting to the tools and methods provided.
  • Scaling Limitations
    Startups that grow rapidly might find the initial set of tools and services insufficient as they scale, requiring additional resources or investment.

arXiv features and specs

  • Open Access
    arXiv offers free access to a wide range of scientific papers, providing open access to high-quality research without paywalls.
  • Rapid Dissemination
    Researchers can quickly share their findings with the global community, potentially accelerating scientific progress.
  • Large Repository
    With millions of papers in various fields such as physics, computer science, and mathematics, arXiv is a comprehensive resource for researchers.
  • Preprints
    Authors can share their manuscripts before formal peer review, which allows for immediate feedback and increased visibility.
  • Community and Collaborations
    arXiv fosters a collaborative environment where researchers can easily find and build on each other's work.

Possible disadvantages of arXiv

  • Lack of Peer Review
    Papers submitted to arXiv are not peer-reviewed, which means the quality and reliability of the content can vary.
  • Overwhelming Volume
    The sheer number of papers can make it difficult to find relevant and high-quality research.
  • Variable Quality
    Since submissions are not vetted through a rigorous peer review process, the quality of papers can range from excellent to poor.
  • Potential for Plagiarism
    The open nature of arXiv can sometimes lead to issues with plagiarism or uncredited use of ideas.
  • Not Recognized by Some Journals
    Some academic journals do not consider papers uploaded to arXiv as unpublished, which can affect a researcherโ€™s ability to publish in those journals.

Analysis of arXiv

Overall verdict

  • Yes, arXiv is considered good, especially for academics and researchers who need access to the latest research developments or want to share their work broadly and promptly.

Why this product is good

  • arXiv is a highly respected open-access repository for scholarly articles in fields such as physics, computer science, mathematics, statistics, and more. It allows researchers to share their findings quickly and receive feedback from the global academic community. As a preprint server, it aids in the rapid dissemination of research, which can be critical in rapidly evolving fields and during public health crises.

Recommended for

    Students, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.

Found.dev videos

No Found.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

arXiv videos

How to submit a paper to arxiv

More videos:

  • Review - Do Research on arXiv
  • Review - RNAAS banned on arXiv

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Found.dev and arXiv)
Hiring And Recruitment
100 100%
0% 0
Education
0 0%
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
0% 0
Ebooks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Found.dev and arXiv. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, arXiv seems to be a lot more popular than Found.dev. While we know about 334 links to arXiv, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Found.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Found.dev mentions (3)

  • [Meta] Require job postings to include the salary range.
    Not all jobs have a salary range. I scrape hundreds of sites for found.dev and in most of the job postings, there is no salary indicated at all. This is specially common in some countries like Germany, where the salary is something you negotiate privately with the employer, without the employer offering you any information about the range first. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Launching Found.dev
    At the end of March 2021, I decided the project was ready to see the light, so I launched Found.dev. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • How to Crash Your Startup
    The real problem is that I think I'm making the very same mistake now..... I launched a few weeks ago found.dev and I'm offering free subscriptions to companies to post jobs there, and even with the free subscriptions I'm not getting enough users. It might be time to pivot or stop before it's too late .... Source: about 5 years ago

arXiv mentions (334)

  • How to Evaluate AI Agents: 3 Framework Comparison
    The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • I Built a $0 Search Engine on Real Web Data (No Algolia or Elasticsearch)
    I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโ€™d run four or five of these, collate the resultsโ€ฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Adiรณs a Agile en 2026: el auge del Spec-Driven Development con IA
    ArXiv โ€” Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Should You Be Using RAG in 2026?
    Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • LLM Fine-Tuning: The Complete Guide to Customizing Language Models (2026)
    This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ€” with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Found.dev and arXiv, you can also consider the following products

entry.dev - Entry-level developer jobs

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Lemon.io - Lemon.io is a community of vetted offshore developers for startups.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

Cloud Devs - Hire from our exclusive pool of highly-vetted remote LatAm developers and designers starting from 45usd/ hour.

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.