Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Forms On Fire VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Forms On Fire VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Forms On Fire logo Forms On Fire

Forms On Fire provides a complete, customizable mobile forms and workflow system that is reliable and secure, works offline or online.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • Forms On Fire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Forms On Fire features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Forms On Fire offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible to users of varying technical expertise.
  • Offline Functionality
    The platform allows users to collect data offline and sync it later when an internet connection is available, making it ideal for fieldwork.
  • Customizable Forms
    Enables users to create highly customizable and tailored forms to fit specific data collection needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Supports integration with various other tools and platforms, such as Excel, Google Sheets, and Microsoft Power BI.
  • Data Security
    Provides robust data security features to ensure that sensitive information is protected.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    Available on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and web browsers, allowing flexibility in how users can access the service.
  • Advanced Reporting
    Includes advanced reporting and analytics capabilities to help users make informed decisions based on collected data.

Possible disadvantages of Forms On Fire

  • Cost
    Forms On Fire can be relatively expensive compared to some other form-building solutions, which could be a barrier for smaller organizations or individuals.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, some advanced features may require a learning curve to fully utilize.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly with large, complex forms, which can lead to slowdowns.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The features available in the free plan are limited, which may not be sufficient for all users and could necessitate upgrading to a paid plan.
  • Steep Initial Setup
    Setting up the platform and customizing forms initially may be time-consuming, especially for more complex requirements.
  • Customer Support
    While customer support is available, some users have reported slow response times or less-than-satisfactory resolutions to their issues.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Forms On Fire videos

Building Your First Form in Forms On Fire

More videos:

  • Review - Populating Fields in Forms On Fire
  • Review - Introduction to Forms On Fire

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Forms On Fire and CrossBrowserTesting)
Project Management
85 85%
15% 15
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Field Service Management
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Forms On Fire and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Forms On Fire mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Forms On Fire yet. Tracking of Forms On Fire recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Forms On Fire and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

ProntoForms - ProntoForms is a mobile business solutions application, converting paper forms onto any tablet or mobile device.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

GoFormz - GoFormz provides a complete mobile forms and reporting solution.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

ProcessMaker - ProcessMaker is a top-notch Low Code BPM platform used by dozens of businesses worldwide to design and deploy complex processes.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.