Software Alternatives & Startups

FormKeep VS Web3Forms

Compare FormKeep VS Web3Forms and see what are their differences

FormKeep

Form endpoints for designers and developers

Rating
0 reviews
Web3Forms

Contact forms for static websites without PHP or Backend server

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Web3Forms should be more popular than FormKeep. It has been mentioned 18 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 18
Form Builder popularity
56% vs 44%
alternatives listed
107 vs 90

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

FormKeep
Web3Forms
Website formkeep.com web3forms.com
Pricing
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

FormKeep 6 features
Web3Forms 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    FormKeep offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of setting up and managing forms. It requires minimal technical knowledge, making it accessible to a broad range of users.
  • Third-Party Integrations
    FormKeep supports a variety of third-party integrations such as Zapier, which allows users to connect their forms to other apps and tools, enhancing its functionality.
  • Spam Protection
    The platform includes built-in spam protection to help eliminate unwanted submissions, ensuring that data collected is clean and relevant.
  • Customizability
    FormKeep provides options for custom form designs and notifications, allowing users to tailor the forms to their specific needs and branding.
  • Form Security
    The service offers robust security measures, including SSL encryption, to ensure that submitted data is protected.
  • API Access
    FormKeep provides API access, which allows developers to customize and extend the functionality of the service as needed.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    FormKeep is a paid service and can become expensive, especially for users requiring advanced features or collecting a high volume of submissions.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan is quite limited, offering a very restricted number of form submissions and features, which may not be sufficient for many users.
  • Static Form Requirement
    Forms need to be static HTML, which can be a drawback for users looking to embed forms dynamically or those using certain website builders.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic use is straightforward, leveraging more advanced features and custom integrations may pose a learning curve for some users.
  • No Built-In Analytics
    FormKeep does not offer built-in analytics tools, so users will need to rely on third-party services to track form performance and submission data.
  • Ease of Use
    Web3Forms is designed to be user-friendly, allowing even those with minimal technical skills to set up and integrate forms quickly.
  • No Backend Required
    Eliminates the need for a custom backend to handle form submissions, as Web3Forms manages it for you.
  • Privacy-focused
    Web3Forms emphasizes user privacy by not storing form submissions permanently, reducing the risk of data breaches.
  • Spam Protection
    Includes spam protection features which help to minimize unwanted submissions, thus maintaining the quality of data collected.
  • Cost-effective
    Offers a cost-efficient solution for handling form submissions when compared to developing and maintaining a custom solution.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Customization
    Users with specific or complex needs may find Web3Forms' customization options less flexible than a custom backend.
  • Dependency on Third Party
    Reliance on a third-party service for form handling can present risks if the service has downtimes or changes its feature offerings or pricing.
  • Feature Limitations
    Might not offer advanced features that large organizations or projects with complex workflows might require.
  • Integration Limitations
    While easy to implement, integration with other systems or platforms might require additional work or might not support all desired integrations.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Depending on their growth, users might find Web3Forms insufficient as their needs scale beyond what the platform offers.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

FormKeep 2 videos + Add
Web3Forms 1 video + Add

Form Designer - FormKeep Guide

More videos

  • - Slack Integration - FormKeep Update

Web3forms - cheap, light and fast contact form for your website

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
FormKeep
Web3Forms
56% 56%
44% 44%
27% 27%
73% 73%
49% 49%
51% 51%
59% 59%
41% 41%

User comments

Share your experience with using FormKeep and Web3Forms. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

FormKeep 3 mentions
Web3Forms 18 mentions
  • Domain for a small tool => .xyz or .co.in?
    I have created a small tool like https://www.netlify.com/products/forms/ or https://formkeep.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to send your html form to Google Sheets for free
    Formkeep.com (https://formkeep.com) The management application for this platform is possibly the most extensive of all the services reviewed there, but at the same time it is also the hardest and most confusing to use. When setting up... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
  • Just got my portfolio up. Would really appreciate some feedback.
    I’m going to set up a back end for it soon when I learn Node, but for now I’m just using https://formkeep.com/ which works but is not ideal. Source: over 5 years ago

View more

Alternatives to FormKeep and Web3Forms

When comparing FormKeep and Web3Forms, you can also consider the following products.