
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

GitLab
GitHub
BitBucket
GitBucket
Gitea
SourceHut
Deveo
The on-premises version of GitHub, which you can deploy and manage in your own, secure environment
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than GitHub Enterprise. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of GitHub Enterprise yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
A look at the new GitHub Enterprise
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and GitHub Enterprise. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Here's the problem we were solving: we run GitHub Enterprise behind a VPN. Modern AI code review tools like Cursor, Github Copilot, and CodeRabbit expect cloud-hosted repos. We couldn't pipe proprietary code into them. But we still... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Internal is a special visibility level used by GitHub Enterprise, allowing anyone inside your organization to see the repository, but nobody in the outside world. We generally suggest this as the default level for company projects that... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
If the company you work for has subscribed to Github, you probably benefit from a more substantial offer with additional features (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
When comparing Foam and GitHub Enterprise, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or GitHub Enterprise:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to Foam or GitHub Enterprise:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or GitHub Enterprise:

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to Foam or GitHub Enterprise:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or GitHub Enterprise:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to Foam or GitHub Enterprise: